Assessment of sub-band division and energy computation techniques as fundamental stages for a neuro-feedback training system

L. Sepúlveda-Cano, G. Daza-Santacoloma
{"title":"Assessment of sub-band division and energy computation techniques as fundamental stages for a neuro-feedback training system","authors":"L. Sepúlveda-Cano, G. Daza-Santacoloma","doi":"10.1109/STSIVA.2016.7743332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The improvement of skills and cognitive abilities by means of neurofeedback training has been turned into an issue of interest in healthy population. These studies have shown a positive correlation between the neurofeedback training and the improvement of the cognitive skills of the people. Typically, in a neurofeedback system the first stage is the artifact remotion, the next stage is the separation of the EEG signal into frequency sub-bands and the last stage is the characterization of the sub-bands energy. Aiming to obtain the desired feedback, the mentioned stages have to be done as quickly and as accurately as possible. A mistake in these stages can lead to consequences as simple as a fruitless training, altering the desired cognitive improvement. In this paper, different techniques for sub-band separation and characterization are compared, aiming to find the most suitable techniques in order to be applied in a neurofeedback system, the techniques are collated according to the non-stationary behavior of the EEG signal and the stability (variability) of the outputs. Results show that the most stable and stationary combination is that determined by the EEG separation through IFFT and the energy calculation through the Teager-Kaiser, followed by its improved version. As conclusion, the IFFT for EEG sub-band separation, and Teager-Kaiser or its improvement for energy calculation, are recommend for a Neurofeedback system for cognitive improvement in healthy population.","PeriodicalId":373420,"journal":{"name":"2016 XXI Symposium on Signal Processing, Images and Artificial Vision (STSIVA)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 XXI Symposium on Signal Processing, Images and Artificial Vision (STSIVA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STSIVA.2016.7743332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The improvement of skills and cognitive abilities by means of neurofeedback training has been turned into an issue of interest in healthy population. These studies have shown a positive correlation between the neurofeedback training and the improvement of the cognitive skills of the people. Typically, in a neurofeedback system the first stage is the artifact remotion, the next stage is the separation of the EEG signal into frequency sub-bands and the last stage is the characterization of the sub-bands energy. Aiming to obtain the desired feedback, the mentioned stages have to be done as quickly and as accurately as possible. A mistake in these stages can lead to consequences as simple as a fruitless training, altering the desired cognitive improvement. In this paper, different techniques for sub-band separation and characterization are compared, aiming to find the most suitable techniques in order to be applied in a neurofeedback system, the techniques are collated according to the non-stationary behavior of the EEG signal and the stability (variability) of the outputs. Results show that the most stable and stationary combination is that determined by the EEG separation through IFFT and the energy calculation through the Teager-Kaiser, followed by its improved version. As conclusion, the IFFT for EEG sub-band separation, and Teager-Kaiser or its improvement for energy calculation, are recommend for a Neurofeedback system for cognitive improvement in healthy population.
评估子带划分和能量计算技术作为神经反馈训练系统的基本阶段
通过神经反馈训练提高技能和认知能力已成为健康人群感兴趣的问题。这些研究表明,神经反馈训练与人们认知能力的提高之间存在正相关关系。通常,在神经反馈系统中,第一阶段是去除伪影,第二阶段是将EEG信号分离成频率子带,最后阶段是表征子带的能量。为了获得期望的反馈,上述阶段必须尽可能快速和准确地完成。在这些阶段的一个错误可能会导致一个简单的后果,如徒劳的训练,改变预期的认知改善。本文对不同的子带分离和表征技术进行了比较,旨在找到最适合应用于神经反馈系统的技术,根据脑电信号的非平稳行为和输出的稳定性(可变性)对这些技术进行了整理。结果表明,通过IFFT分离脑电信号并通过Teager-Kaiser计算能量确定的组合是最稳定和平稳的,其次是其改进版本。综上所述,IFFT用于脑电子带分离,Teager-Kaiser或其改进用于能量计算,可推荐用于健康人群认知改善的神经反馈系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信