Implementation Of Social Security As A Form Of Assurance Of Workers' Rights In Obtaining Employment Social Security Protection In Indonesia

Achmad Johansyah, Siti Hajati Hoesin
{"title":"Implementation Of Social Security As A Form Of Assurance Of Workers' Rights In Obtaining Employment Social Security Protection In Indonesia","authors":"Achmad Johansyah, Siti Hajati Hoesin","doi":"10.29303/ulrev.v6i1.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authority to administer social security for ASN (Civil Servant) in Indonesia is an important issue that must be resolved as a form of active attitude in providing certainty of rights to social security. The emergence of regulations issued by the state through its current government has resulted in a difference in the acquisition of rights to social security for ASN and which institutions have the authority to administer it. The regulations are the ASN Law and PP 70/2015. The research aims to analyse the certainty of the authority to administer and acquire social security rights for ASN based on the laws and regulations governing the implementation of social security. This study uses a juridical-normative approach and is descriptive. Based on the research conducted, the results obtained are that the authority for administering social security for ASN in Indonesia is regulated in the SJSN Law and the BPJS Law, where two BPJS are authorised to manage social security based on SJSN, namely BPJS Health and BPJS Employment. This authority can also be seen from the legal principle of Lex Specialis Derogat Lex Generalis, where the authority to administer social security for ASN must refer to the SJSN Law and BPJS Law, not the ASN Law. The Constitutional Court Number 7/PUU-III/2005 also confirms that the implementation of ASN social security, which state-owned companies previously carried out, is contrary to the 1945 Constitution and has no binding legal force. The existence of different interpretations and practices of ASN social security protection that are not following the current SJSN creates uncertainty and the potential loss of rights to social security protection for ASN, especially JKP, which was born after the enactment of the Job Creation Law and PP 37/2021.","PeriodicalId":406021,"journal":{"name":"Unram Law Review","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unram Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v6i1.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authority to administer social security for ASN (Civil Servant) in Indonesia is an important issue that must be resolved as a form of active attitude in providing certainty of rights to social security. The emergence of regulations issued by the state through its current government has resulted in a difference in the acquisition of rights to social security for ASN and which institutions have the authority to administer it. The regulations are the ASN Law and PP 70/2015. The research aims to analyse the certainty of the authority to administer and acquire social security rights for ASN based on the laws and regulations governing the implementation of social security. This study uses a juridical-normative approach and is descriptive. Based on the research conducted, the results obtained are that the authority for administering social security for ASN in Indonesia is regulated in the SJSN Law and the BPJS Law, where two BPJS are authorised to manage social security based on SJSN, namely BPJS Health and BPJS Employment. This authority can also be seen from the legal principle of Lex Specialis Derogat Lex Generalis, where the authority to administer social security for ASN must refer to the SJSN Law and BPJS Law, not the ASN Law. The Constitutional Court Number 7/PUU-III/2005 also confirms that the implementation of ASN social security, which state-owned companies previously carried out, is contrary to the 1945 Constitution and has no binding legal force. The existence of different interpretations and practices of ASN social security protection that are not following the current SJSN creates uncertainty and the potential loss of rights to social security protection for ASN, especially JKP, which was born after the enactment of the Job Creation Law and PP 37/2021.
社会保障作为工人获得就业社会保障权利的一种保障形式在印度尼西亚的实施
印度尼西亚公务员管理社会保障的权力是一个重要问题,必须作为积极态度的一种形式加以解决,以确保社会保障权利。国家通过其现任政府颁布的法规的出现,导致了ASN在获得社会保障权利以及哪些机构有权管理社会保障方面的差异。这些法规是ASN法和PP 70/2015。本研究旨在根据社会保障实施的法律法规,分析ASN管理和获得社会保障权利的权力的确定性。本研究采用司法规范的方法,是描述性的。根据所进行的研究,获得的结果是,在印度尼西亚,ASN管理社会保障的权力由SJSN法和BPJS法规定,其中授权两个BPJS根据SJSN管理社会保障,即BPJS Health和BPJS Employment。这种权力也可以从Lex Specialis Derogat Lex Generalis的法律原则中看出,ASN管理社会保障的权力必须参考SJSN法和BPJS法,而不是ASN法。第7/PUU-III/2005号宪法法院也确认,以前由国有公司实施的ASN社会保障违反1945年《宪法》,没有法律约束力。ASN社会保障的不同解释和实践的存在不符合当前的SJSN,给ASN带来了不确定性,并可能失去社会保障保护的权利,特别是JKP,它是在创造就业法和PP 37/2021颁布之后诞生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信