Predicting Stealthy Watermarks in Files Using Deep Learning

M. Sabir, James H. Jones, Hang Liu, Alex V. Mbaziira
{"title":"Predicting Stealthy Watermarks in Files Using Deep Learning","authors":"M. Sabir, James H. Jones, Hang Liu, Alex V. Mbaziira","doi":"10.1109/ISDFS.2019.8757538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital evidence is a fundamental element in cyber-forensics and judicial processes. However, the work of forensic examiners is becoming more challenging as the volume digital content and files increases. In this paper, we use machine learning especially deep learning to detect stealthy watermarks in various types of files. We use a black box approach which is different from current steganographic and cryptographic methods to find patterns of candidate file locations for hidden data We studied Deep Neural Networks (DNN) to predict stealthy watermarks in files using the deep learning implementation (DL4J) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) algorithms as implemented in Weka. We evaluated MLP models by altering the number of neurons and hidden layers while the DL4J models were evaluated by varying the number of dense layers and nodes. For the MLP models, DOCX & PPTX singleton models predicted stealthy watermarks in files with predictive accuracies ranging from 47.5% to 100%; JPEG singleton models registered predictive accuracies ranging from 35% to 65%. Comparatively, HYBRID3 models had predictive accuracies ranging from 42.5% to 95% while HYBRID_OOXML had predictive accuracies of 47.5% to 100%. However, JPEG_DOCX had predictive accuracies 47.5% to 97.5% while JPEG_PPTX had predictive accuracies of 40% to 85%. Furthermore for DL4J models, we only generated HYBRID3 models, which predicted stealthy watermarks in DOCX files with predictive accuracies 100%. The HYBRID3 DL4J model predicted stealthy watermarks in PPTX with predictive accuracies ranging from 55% to 82 % while in JPEG, the predictive accuracies from 50% to 52.5%. The major finding with deep learning also revealed improvements in prediction of stealthy watermarks in PPTX files using DL4J models.","PeriodicalId":247412,"journal":{"name":"2019 7th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 7th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDFS.2019.8757538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital evidence is a fundamental element in cyber-forensics and judicial processes. However, the work of forensic examiners is becoming more challenging as the volume digital content and files increases. In this paper, we use machine learning especially deep learning to detect stealthy watermarks in various types of files. We use a black box approach which is different from current steganographic and cryptographic methods to find patterns of candidate file locations for hidden data We studied Deep Neural Networks (DNN) to predict stealthy watermarks in files using the deep learning implementation (DL4J) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) algorithms as implemented in Weka. We evaluated MLP models by altering the number of neurons and hidden layers while the DL4J models were evaluated by varying the number of dense layers and nodes. For the MLP models, DOCX & PPTX singleton models predicted stealthy watermarks in files with predictive accuracies ranging from 47.5% to 100%; JPEG singleton models registered predictive accuracies ranging from 35% to 65%. Comparatively, HYBRID3 models had predictive accuracies ranging from 42.5% to 95% while HYBRID_OOXML had predictive accuracies of 47.5% to 100%. However, JPEG_DOCX had predictive accuracies 47.5% to 97.5% while JPEG_PPTX had predictive accuracies of 40% to 85%. Furthermore for DL4J models, we only generated HYBRID3 models, which predicted stealthy watermarks in DOCX files with predictive accuracies 100%. The HYBRID3 DL4J model predicted stealthy watermarks in PPTX with predictive accuracies ranging from 55% to 82 % while in JPEG, the predictive accuracies from 50% to 52.5%. The major finding with deep learning also revealed improvements in prediction of stealthy watermarks in PPTX files using DL4J models.
利用深度学习预测文件中的隐形水印
数字证据是网络取证和司法程序的基本要素。然而,随着数字内容和文件数量的增加,法医审查员的工作变得越来越具有挑战性。在本文中,我们使用机器学习特别是深度学习来检测各种类型文件中的隐形水印。我们使用一种不同于当前隐写和加密方法的黑盒方法来寻找隐藏数据的候选文件位置模式。我们研究了深度神经网络(DNN),使用深度学习实现(DL4J)和多层感知器(MLP)算法来预测文件中的隐形水印。我们通过改变神经元和隐藏层的数量来评估MLP模型,而通过改变密集层和节点的数量来评估DL4J模型。对于MLP模型,DOCX和PPTX单模型预测文件中的隐形水印,预测准确率从47.5%到100%不等;JPEG单例模型的预测准确率在35%到65%之间。相比之下,HYBRID3模型的预测准确率在42.5%到95%之间,而HYBRID_OOXML的预测准确率在47.5%到100%之间。然而,JPEG_DOCX的预测准确率为47.5%至97.5%,而JPEG_PPTX的预测准确率为40%至85%。此外,对于DL4J模型,我们只生成了HYBRID3模型,它预测DOCX文件中的隐形水印,预测准确率为100%。HYBRID3 DL4J模型在PPTX中预测隐形水印的准确率从55%到82%不等,而在JPEG中,预测准确率从50%到52.5%不等。深度学习的主要发现还揭示了使用DL4J模型预测PPTX文件中隐形水印的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信