On-path vs off-path traffic steering, that is the question

K. Khandaker, D. Trossen, Jinze Yang, Z. Despotovic, G. Carle
{"title":"On-path vs off-path traffic steering, that is the question","authors":"K. Khandaker, D. Trossen, Jinze Yang, Z. Despotovic, G. Carle","doi":"10.1145/3527974.3545721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Service-level traffic steering in the Internet has been using an indirection-based model for decades now, using the DNS to resolve a name to a locator, often complemented with load balancing techniques. Contrasting this off-path realization, service information as part of the data packet itself may determine the one of possibly many communication endpoints on-path while traversing the network. This paper compares both design choices regardless of the specific decision mechanism used. For this, we assume a compute-aware traffic steering mechanism for both approaches and determine latency penalties through off-path resolution steps as well as distributing scheduling decisions to on-path network ingress points. Lastly, we investigate latency variances and resilience in an AR/VR scenario.","PeriodicalId":294749,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Future of Internet Routing & Addressing","volume":"662 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Future of Internet Routing & Addressing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3527974.3545721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Service-level traffic steering in the Internet has been using an indirection-based model for decades now, using the DNS to resolve a name to a locator, often complemented with load balancing techniques. Contrasting this off-path realization, service information as part of the data packet itself may determine the one of possibly many communication endpoints on-path while traversing the network. This paper compares both design choices regardless of the specific decision mechanism used. For this, we assume a compute-aware traffic steering mechanism for both approaches and determine latency penalties through off-path resolution steps as well as distributing scheduling decisions to on-path network ingress points. Lastly, we investigate latency variances and resilience in an AR/VR scenario.
道路上与非道路交通转向,这是一个问题
几十年来,互联网中的服务级流量控制一直使用基于间接的模型,使用DNS将名称解析为定位器,通常辅以负载平衡技术。与这种非路径实现相比,作为数据包本身的一部分的服务信息可以在遍历网络时确定可能的许多通信端点中的一个。本文比较了两种设计选择,而不考虑所使用的具体决策机制。为此,我们假设两种方法都有计算感知的流量转向机制,并通过离路解析步骤确定延迟惩罚,以及将调度决策分发到路径上的网络入口点。最后,我们研究了AR/VR场景中的延迟差异和弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信