Professional Competencies in Computing Education: Pedagogies and Assessment

R. Raj, Mihaela Sabin, J. Impagliazzo, D. Bowers, M. Daniels, F. Hermans, Natalie Kiesler, Amruth N. Kumar, Bonnie K. MacKellar, R. McCauley, Syedali Nabi, M. Oudshoorn
{"title":"Professional Competencies in Computing Education: Pedagogies and Assessment","authors":"R. Raj, Mihaela Sabin, J. Impagliazzo, D. Bowers, M. Daniels, F. Hermans, Natalie Kiesler, Amruth N. Kumar, Bonnie K. MacKellar, R. McCauley, Syedali Nabi, M. Oudshoorn","doi":"10.1145/3502870.3506570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competency-based learning has been a successful pedagogical approach for centuries, but only recently has it gained traction within computing. Competencies, as defined in Computing Curricula 2020, comprise knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions. Building on recent developments in competency and computing education, this working group examined relevant pedagogical theories, investigates various skill frameworks, reviewed competencies and standard practices in other professional disciplines such as medicine and law. It also investigated the integrative nature of content knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions in defining professional competencies in computing education. In addition, the group explored appropriate pedagogies and competency assessment approaches. It also developed guidelines for evaluating student achievement against relevant professional competency frameworks and explores partnering with employers to offer students genuine professional experience. Finally, possible challenges and opportunities in moving from traditional knowledge-based to competency-based education were also examined. This report makes recommendations to inspire educators of future computing professionals and smooth students' transition from academia to employment.","PeriodicalId":166638,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3502870.3506570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Competency-based learning has been a successful pedagogical approach for centuries, but only recently has it gained traction within computing. Competencies, as defined in Computing Curricula 2020, comprise knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions. Building on recent developments in competency and computing education, this working group examined relevant pedagogical theories, investigates various skill frameworks, reviewed competencies and standard practices in other professional disciplines such as medicine and law. It also investigated the integrative nature of content knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions in defining professional competencies in computing education. In addition, the group explored appropriate pedagogies and competency assessment approaches. It also developed guidelines for evaluating student achievement against relevant professional competency frameworks and explores partnering with employers to offer students genuine professional experience. Finally, possible challenges and opportunities in moving from traditional knowledge-based to competency-based education were also examined. This report makes recommendations to inspire educators of future computing professionals and smooth students' transition from academia to employment.
计算机教育的专业能力:教学法与评估
几个世纪以来,基于能力的学习一直是一种成功的教学方法,但直到最近,它才在计算机领域获得了关注。能力,如《计算机课程2020》所定义的,包括知识、技能和专业素养。基于能力和计算机教育的最新发展,该工作组审查了相关的教学理论,调查了各种技能框架,审查了医学和法律等其他专业学科的能力和标准实践。它还调查了定义计算机教育专业能力的内容、知识、技能和专业倾向的综合性质。此外,小组探讨了适当的教学方法和能力评估方法。它还制定了根据相关专业能力框架评估学生成绩的指导方针,并探索与雇主合作,为学生提供真正的专业经验。最后,本文还探讨了从传统的以知识为基础的教育转向以能力为基础的教育可能面临的挑战和机遇。该报告提出了一些建议,以激励未来计算机专业的教育者,并使学生从学术界顺利过渡到就业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信