A Comparison of the Lehmann and GLM ROC Models

Melissa Innerst, J. Tubbs, M. Ghebremichael
{"title":"A Comparison of the Lehmann and GLM ROC Models","authors":"Melissa Innerst, J. Tubbs, M. Ghebremichael","doi":"10.11648/J.SJAMS.20210902.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, several regression methods have been developed to model the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), as a measure of accuracy for potential biomarker use in diagnostic testing and disease detection. In this paper, we investigate the Lehmann ROC regression model and compare it to more commonly used ROC regression methods that are found in the literature. The comparative performance of the methods are evaluated using simulated data from the normal, extreme value, and the Weibull distributions. Theory suggests that the Lehmann method should only work well when using the Weibull distribution. Our simulation results suggest that the performance of these methods is more complicated than the theory might suggest. The methods were demonstrated using data from a study concerning the clinical effectiveness of leukocyte elastase determination in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD).","PeriodicalId":422938,"journal":{"name":"Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.SJAMS.20210902.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, several regression methods have been developed to model the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), as a measure of accuracy for potential biomarker use in diagnostic testing and disease detection. In this paper, we investigate the Lehmann ROC regression model and compare it to more commonly used ROC regression methods that are found in the literature. The comparative performance of the methods are evaluated using simulated data from the normal, extreme value, and the Weibull distributions. Theory suggests that the Lehmann method should only work well when using the Weibull distribution. Our simulation results suggest that the performance of these methods is more complicated than the theory might suggest. The methods were demonstrated using data from a study concerning the clinical effectiveness of leukocyte elastase determination in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD).
Lehmann和GLM ROC模型的比较
最近,已经开发了几种回归方法来模拟受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),作为在诊断测试和疾病检测中潜在生物标志物使用的准确性度量。在本文中,我们研究了Lehmann ROC回归模型,并将其与文献中更常用的ROC回归方法进行比较。使用来自正态分布、极值分布和威布尔分布的模拟数据对方法的比较性能进行了评估。理论表明,莱曼方法只有在使用威布尔分布时才有效。我们的模拟结果表明,这些方法的性能比理论所暗示的要复杂得多。这些方法是用一项关于白细胞弹性酶测定在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)诊断中的临床有效性的研究数据来证明的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信