A Rule Against Perpetuities for the Twenty-First Century

F. Schneider
{"title":"A Rule Against Perpetuities for the Twenty-First Century","authors":"F. Schneider","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.887921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The common law rule against perpetuities maintained alienation of property by voiding interests in property that did not vest within a life in being at the creation of the interest plus twenty-one years. The rule was applied strictly, often producing harsh results. The courts used a what-might-happen test to strike down nonvested interests that might not have vested in a timely manner. During the last half-century, many legislatures have softened the application of the rule against perpetuities by enacting wait-and-see provisions, which require courts to decide cases based on the facts as they actually developed, and reformation, which allowed some nonvested interests to be reformed to save them from invalidity. This paper describes the common law rule. Then it traces the modern developments, including promulgation of the widely adopted Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities, which includes an alternate 90 year fixed wait-and-see period to be applied in place of the common law's lives in being plus twenty-one years. The paper continues by exploring the policies which underlie the rule against perpetuities. Then, after finding that there is no significant movement to repeal the rule except for trusts, it is established that proposals for that federal law, including federal transfer taxes, cannot and should not be used to implement the policies served by the rule itself. There is a continuing need for state rules against perpetuities. The paper proposes that the rule be modified to make it more understandable and easier to apply. The proposed rule would replace lives in being plus twenty-one years with a fixed term of years. This would eliminate most of the difficulties encountered in application of the rule. Wait-and-see and reformation are part of the proposed rule. The proposed rule provides for determination of valid interests at the end of the fixed term of year Rule and contains a definition of \"vested\" to enable judges and attorneys to apply the rule in cases which will arise many years in the future.","PeriodicalId":297504,"journal":{"name":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legislation & Statutory Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.887921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The common law rule against perpetuities maintained alienation of property by voiding interests in property that did not vest within a life in being at the creation of the interest plus twenty-one years. The rule was applied strictly, often producing harsh results. The courts used a what-might-happen test to strike down nonvested interests that might not have vested in a timely manner. During the last half-century, many legislatures have softened the application of the rule against perpetuities by enacting wait-and-see provisions, which require courts to decide cases based on the facts as they actually developed, and reformation, which allowed some nonvested interests to be reformed to save them from invalidity. This paper describes the common law rule. Then it traces the modern developments, including promulgation of the widely adopted Uniform Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities, which includes an alternate 90 year fixed wait-and-see period to be applied in place of the common law's lives in being plus twenty-one years. The paper continues by exploring the policies which underlie the rule against perpetuities. Then, after finding that there is no significant movement to repeal the rule except for trusts, it is established that proposals for that federal law, including federal transfer taxes, cannot and should not be used to implement the policies served by the rule itself. There is a continuing need for state rules against perpetuities. The paper proposes that the rule be modified to make it more understandable and easier to apply. The proposed rule would replace lives in being plus twenty-one years with a fixed term of years. This would eliminate most of the difficulties encountered in application of the rule. Wait-and-see and reformation are part of the proposed rule. The proposed rule provides for determination of valid interests at the end of the fixed term of year Rule and contains a definition of "vested" to enable judges and attorneys to apply the rule in cases which will arise many years in the future.
二十一世纪的反永续规则
普通法中反对永续权的规则通过在权益产生时加上21年的期限内,将财产的权益无效来维持财产的转让。这条规则执行得很严格,结果往往很残酷。法院使用“可能发生什么”的测试来打击那些可能没有及时归属的非既得利益。在过去的半个世纪里,许多立法机构通过制定观望条款和改革,软化了反对永续性规则的适用,这些条款要求法院根据案件实际发展的事实来裁决案件,而改革则允许对一些非既得利益进行改革,以使其免于无效。本文介绍了英美法系的规则。然后,它追溯了现代的发展,包括广泛采用的《反对永续财产统一法定规则》的颁布,其中包括一个替代的90年固定观望期,以取代普通法的寿命加21年。本文继续探讨了反永续规则的政策基础。然后,在发现除了信托之外没有重大的运动废除该规则之后,可以确定的是,该联邦法律的提案,包括联邦转移税,不能也不应该被用来实施该规则本身所服务的政策。各州仍有必要制定针对永续年金的规定。本文建议对该规则进行修改,使其更易于理解和应用。拟议的规则将用固定年限取代21岁以上的寿命。这将消除在适用该规则时遇到的大多数困难。观望和改革是拟议规则的一部分。拟议规则规定在固定年度规则结束时确定有效利益,并载有“既得”的定义,使法官和律师能够将该规则适用于许多年后出现的案件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信