Deification and Creativity

R. Coates
{"title":"Deification and Creativity","authors":"R. Coates","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198836230.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 4 analyses Nikolai Berdiaev’s first philosophical statement The Meaning of Creativity (1916) in the context of the theosophy of Jakob Boehme. It is shown how Berdiaev adopts the deification narrative primarily as expressed by Boehme rather than in the Orthodox theological tradition, and the ways in which the two narratives diverge are analysed. Berdiaev tends towards a Gnostic attitude to the material world and the body and an Origenistic view of the pre-existence of the soul. Most importantly, his reading of human–divine synergy in the task of transfiguring the universe emphasizes the superiority of human over divine agency after the Incarnation. The chapter goes on to set the work in the context of Berdiaev’s critique of the Russian Orthodox Church and of Russian Symbolism. His contemporaries’ response to the work is drawn on to suggest that Berdiaev’s Nietzschean persona opens him to the charge of illegitimate self-apotheosis.","PeriodicalId":427523,"journal":{"name":"Deification in Russian Religious Thought","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deification in Russian Religious Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198836230.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 4 analyses Nikolai Berdiaev’s first philosophical statement The Meaning of Creativity (1916) in the context of the theosophy of Jakob Boehme. It is shown how Berdiaev adopts the deification narrative primarily as expressed by Boehme rather than in the Orthodox theological tradition, and the ways in which the two narratives diverge are analysed. Berdiaev tends towards a Gnostic attitude to the material world and the body and an Origenistic view of the pre-existence of the soul. Most importantly, his reading of human–divine synergy in the task of transfiguring the universe emphasizes the superiority of human over divine agency after the Incarnation. The chapter goes on to set the work in the context of Berdiaev’s critique of the Russian Orthodox Church and of Russian Symbolism. His contemporaries’ response to the work is drawn on to suggest that Berdiaev’s Nietzschean persona opens him to the charge of illegitimate self-apotheosis.
神化与创造
第四章分析了尼古拉·别尔迪亚耶夫的第一个哲学命题《创造力的意义》(1916)。它显示了别尔迪亚耶夫如何采用神化叙事主要是由Boehme表达的,而不是在东正教神学传统中,并分析了两种叙事分歧的方式。别尔迪亚耶夫倾向于对物质世界和身体持诺斯替主义的态度,对灵魂的前存在持本源论的观点。最重要的是,他对人与神在改造宇宙任务中的协同作用的解读,强调了人在化身之后对神的代理的优越性。本章将继续把这部作品置于别尔迪亚耶夫对俄罗斯东正教和俄罗斯象征主义的批判的背景下。他同时代的人对这部作品的反应表明,别尔迪亚耶夫的尼采式人格使他受到了非法的自我神化的指控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信