Affection and Solidarity among 19th-Century Black Intellectuals in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo

A. Pinto
{"title":"Affection and Solidarity among 19th-Century Black Intellectuals in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo","authors":"A. Pinto","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brazil had the largest population of free and freed Black people on the continent, starting in the early 19th century, despite being the last country in the Americas to abolish slavery. The 1872 General Census of the Empire reported that six out of every ten Black or brown people could claim a series of rights associated with citizenship by virtue of not being enslaved. These included some individuals who were literate and active in the cultural and political spaces in which plans for the country’s present and future were drawn up. Especially in the second half of the 19th century, a time of deepening crisis for the slaveholding system, individuals such as José Ferreira de Menezes, Luiz Gama, Machado de Assis, José do Patrocínio, Ignácio de Araújo Lima, Arthur Carlos, and Theophilo Dias de Castro, all of whom were born free and resided in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, invested in their individual aspirations but also joined groups that defended the citizenship rights of free, freed, and enslaved Black people. Facing daily experiences of “color prejudice,” they not only participated in debates waged in the abolitionist, Black, literary, and general press, but they also played leading roles in the creation of mechanisms and instruments of resistance, confrontation, and dialogue. Although this aspect has not received much attention in recent historical accounts that recognize their existences, these and other Black intellectuals developed bonds of affection and solidarity over the course of their careers. To reflect on the scope of this shared racial identity in the latter 19th century and the possible impact of these ties on public positions taken by Black intellectuals, the demonstrations of friendship and companionship experienced by these individuals are traced, as well as by some others. An exercise in approaching the traces of different practices surrounding the politicization of race is given, and paths for future research on the social history of ideas and antiracism in Brazil are suggested.","PeriodicalId":190332,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brazil had the largest population of free and freed Black people on the continent, starting in the early 19th century, despite being the last country in the Americas to abolish slavery. The 1872 General Census of the Empire reported that six out of every ten Black or brown people could claim a series of rights associated with citizenship by virtue of not being enslaved. These included some individuals who were literate and active in the cultural and political spaces in which plans for the country’s present and future were drawn up. Especially in the second half of the 19th century, a time of deepening crisis for the slaveholding system, individuals such as José Ferreira de Menezes, Luiz Gama, Machado de Assis, José do Patrocínio, Ignácio de Araújo Lima, Arthur Carlos, and Theophilo Dias de Castro, all of whom were born free and resided in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, invested in their individual aspirations but also joined groups that defended the citizenship rights of free, freed, and enslaved Black people. Facing daily experiences of “color prejudice,” they not only participated in debates waged in the abolitionist, Black, literary, and general press, but they also played leading roles in the creation of mechanisms and instruments of resistance, confrontation, and dialogue. Although this aspect has not received much attention in recent historical accounts that recognize their existences, these and other Black intellectuals developed bonds of affection and solidarity over the course of their careers. To reflect on the scope of this shared racial identity in the latter 19th century and the possible impact of these ties on public positions taken by Black intellectuals, the demonstrations of friendship and companionship experienced by these individuals are traced, as well as by some others. An exercise in approaching the traces of different practices surrounding the politicization of race is given, and paths for future research on the social history of ideas and antiracism in Brazil are suggested.
19世纪里约热内卢和圣保罗黑人知识分子之间的感情与团结
尽管巴西是美洲最后一个废除奴隶制的国家,但从19世纪初开始,巴西拥有美洲大陆上最多的自由和被解放的黑人。1872年的帝国人口普查报告显示,每10个黑人或棕色人种中就有6个可以因为没有被奴役而要求一系列与公民身份相关的权利。其中包括一些有文化并活跃于文化和政治领域的个人,在这些领域制定了国家现在和未来的计划。特别是在19世纪下半叶,蓄奴制度危机加深的时候,像约瑟·费雷拉·德·梅内塞斯、路易斯·伽马、马查多·德·阿西斯、约瑟·萨尔瓦多Patrocínio、Ignácio德Araújo利马、阿瑟·卡洛斯和西奥多洛·迪亚斯·德·卡斯特罗这样的人,他们都是生而自由,居住在圣保罗和里约热内卢,他们投资于自己的个人理想,但也加入了捍卫自由、被解放和被奴役的黑人的公民权利的团体。面对“肤色偏见”的日常经历,她们不仅参与废奴主义者、黑人、文学和一般媒体的辩论,而且在创造抵抗、对抗和对话的机制和工具方面发挥了主导作用。尽管这方面在最近承认他们存在的历史记载中没有得到太多关注,但这些黑人知识分子和其他黑人知识分子在他们的职业生涯中建立了感情和团结的纽带。为了反思这种共同的种族身份在19世纪后期的范围以及这些关系对黑人知识分子所采取的公共立场的可能影响,我们追溯了这些人以及其他一些人所经历的友谊和陪伴的表现。在接近不同实践的痕迹周围的种族政治化给出了练习,并为未来的研究路径的思想和反种族主义在巴西的社会历史提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信