Answer Selection Using Reinforcement Learning for Complex Question Answering on the Open Domain

Angel Felipe Magnossão de Paula, Roberto Fray da Silva, B. Nishimoto, C. Cugnasca, Anna Helena Reali Costa
{"title":"Answer Selection Using Reinforcement Learning for Complex Question Answering on the Open Domain","authors":"Angel Felipe Magnossão de Paula, Roberto Fray da Silva, B. Nishimoto, C. Cugnasca, Anna Helena Reali Costa","doi":"10.1145/3459104.3459149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple-choice question answering for the open domain is a task that consists of answering challenging questions from multiple domains, without direct pieces of evidence in the text corpora. The main application of multiple-choice question answering is self-tutoring. We propose the Multiple-Choice Reinforcement Learner (MCRL) model, which uses a policy gradient algorithm in a partially observable Markov decision process to reformulate question-answer pairs in order to find new pieces of evidence to support each answer choice. Its inputs are the question and the answer choices. MCRL learns to generate queries that improve the evidence found for each answer choice, using iteration cycles. After a predefined number of iteration cycles, MCRL provides the best answer choice and the text passages that support it. We use accuracy and mean reward per episode to conduct an in-depth hyperparameter analysis of the number of iteration cycles, reward function design, and weight of the pieces of evidence found in each iteration cycle on the final answer choice. The MCRL model with the best performance reached an accuracy of 0.346, a value higher than naive, random, and the traditional end-to-end deep learning QA models. We conclude with recommendations for future developments of the model, which can be adapted for different languages using text corpora and word embedding models for each language.","PeriodicalId":322229,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Electrical, Electronics and Information Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3459104.3459149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple-choice question answering for the open domain is a task that consists of answering challenging questions from multiple domains, without direct pieces of evidence in the text corpora. The main application of multiple-choice question answering is self-tutoring. We propose the Multiple-Choice Reinforcement Learner (MCRL) model, which uses a policy gradient algorithm in a partially observable Markov decision process to reformulate question-answer pairs in order to find new pieces of evidence to support each answer choice. Its inputs are the question and the answer choices. MCRL learns to generate queries that improve the evidence found for each answer choice, using iteration cycles. After a predefined number of iteration cycles, MCRL provides the best answer choice and the text passages that support it. We use accuracy and mean reward per episode to conduct an in-depth hyperparameter analysis of the number of iteration cycles, reward function design, and weight of the pieces of evidence found in each iteration cycle on the final answer choice. The MCRL model with the best performance reached an accuracy of 0.346, a value higher than naive, random, and the traditional end-to-end deep learning QA models. We conclude with recommendations for future developments of the model, which can be adapted for different languages using text corpora and word embedding models for each language.
基于强化学习的开放域复杂问题答案选择
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信