Assessment of PTDF based power system aggregation schemes

Y. Gebrekiros, G. Doorman, T. Preda, A. Helseth
{"title":"Assessment of PTDF based power system aggregation schemes","authors":"Y. Gebrekiros, G. Doorman, T. Preda, A. Helseth","doi":"10.1109/EPEC.2015.7379976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Power flow computations are essential for many types of power system analyses. In order to reduce computation time and reflect actual power market operation, network aggregation principles are often used. In this work we discuss network aggregation based on power transfer distribution factors (PTDF), by testing three different aggregation schemes. We analyze the performance of the three schemes comparing their solutions with the results obtained from a DC optimal power flow (DCOPF) performed on the non-aggregated system. The performance is evaluated on the IEEE 30-bus test system using three indicators; power generation, inter-zonal flows, and total system costs. To account for wind and load forecast uncertainty, we consider a modified IEEE 30-bus system proposed to address massive wind integration. The case study results show that the choice of weighting scheme significantly impacts the results. In particular, the PTDF aggregation schemes based on nodal injections (production minus demand) and production outperform the pro-rata aggregation scheme.","PeriodicalId":231255,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference (EPEC)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference (EPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEC.2015.7379976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Power flow computations are essential for many types of power system analyses. In order to reduce computation time and reflect actual power market operation, network aggregation principles are often used. In this work we discuss network aggregation based on power transfer distribution factors (PTDF), by testing three different aggregation schemes. We analyze the performance of the three schemes comparing their solutions with the results obtained from a DC optimal power flow (DCOPF) performed on the non-aggregated system. The performance is evaluated on the IEEE 30-bus test system using three indicators; power generation, inter-zonal flows, and total system costs. To account for wind and load forecast uncertainty, we consider a modified IEEE 30-bus system proposed to address massive wind integration. The case study results show that the choice of weighting scheme significantly impacts the results. In particular, the PTDF aggregation schemes based on nodal injections (production minus demand) and production outperform the pro-rata aggregation scheme.
基于PTDF的电力系统聚合方案评估
潮流计算对于许多类型的电力系统分析都是必不可少的。为了减少计算时间和反映电力市场的实际运行情况,通常采用网络聚合原理。在本文中,我们通过测试三种不同的聚合方案,讨论了基于功率传输分配因子(PTDF)的网络聚合。我们分析了这三种方案的性能,并将它们的解与在非聚合系统上执行的直流最优潮流(DCOPF)的结果进行了比较。在IEEE 30总线测试系统上用三个指标对其性能进行了评价;发电量、区域间流量和总系统成本。为了考虑风力和负荷预测的不确定性,我们考虑了一种改进的IEEE 30总线系统,以解决大规模风力集成问题。实例研究结果表明,权重方案的选择对结果有显著影响。特别是,基于节点注入(产量减去需求)和产量的PTDF聚合方案优于按比例聚合方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信