Policy forum

H. Orr
{"title":"Policy forum","authors":"H. Orr","doi":"10.1787/45d4a2c8-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, and the resultant lock-downs and cross-border travel restrictions have reinvigorated public debates about the vulnerability of the global migrants, together with the responsibility of the States to ensure dignified treatment of migrants. Situating within the debates on capability-based development and human dignity and drawing on emerging evidence from Nepal, this opinion piece seeks to explore how returnee Nepali labour migrants from India are subject to dignity vio- lation within the government’s response to the COVID-19. The paper tentatively concludes that the Nepali government’s decision to seal its border with India, and its subsequent interventions to curtail the flow of outbreak, have undermined the human dignity of Nepali migrants. In so doing, the paper raises a normative question as to whether, to what extent and for how long, poor and marginalised pop- ulations such as labour migrants should be expected to endure suffering and dignity violation in the interests of protecting the health of the population at large. The role of contextual politics in shaping the response to the intersecting nature of cross-border and public health crisis is highlighted. Attention is also drawn to the potential of political response against dignity violation, in exposing the ineptitude of the State to safeguard the well-being of its returnee migrants.","PeriodicalId":217621,"journal":{"name":"OECD Regional Outlook 2019","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"97","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OECD Regional Outlook 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/45d4a2c8-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 97

Abstract

The coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, and the resultant lock-downs and cross-border travel restrictions have reinvigorated public debates about the vulnerability of the global migrants, together with the responsibility of the States to ensure dignified treatment of migrants. Situating within the debates on capability-based development and human dignity and drawing on emerging evidence from Nepal, this opinion piece seeks to explore how returnee Nepali labour migrants from India are subject to dignity vio- lation within the government’s response to the COVID-19. The paper tentatively concludes that the Nepali government’s decision to seal its border with India, and its subsequent interventions to curtail the flow of outbreak, have undermined the human dignity of Nepali migrants. In so doing, the paper raises a normative question as to whether, to what extent and for how long, poor and marginalised pop- ulations such as labour migrants should be expected to endure suffering and dignity violation in the interests of protecting the health of the population at large. The role of contextual politics in shaping the response to the intersecting nature of cross-border and public health crisis is highlighted. Attention is also drawn to the potential of political response against dignity violation, in exposing the ineptitude of the State to safeguard the well-being of its returnee migrants.
政策论坛
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的爆发,以及由此导致的封锁和跨境旅行限制,重新激起了公众对全球移民脆弱性的讨论,以及各国确保移民获得有尊严待遇的责任。本文立足于关于能力发展和人的尊严的辩论,并借鉴尼泊尔新出现的证据,试图探讨从印度返回的尼泊尔劳工移民如何在政府应对COVID-19的过程中遭受尊严侵犯。这篇论文的初步结论是,尼泊尔政府封锁与印度边境的决定,以及随后为遏制疫情蔓延而采取的干预措施,损害了尼泊尔移民的人格尊严。在这样做的过程中,该文件提出了一个规范性问题,即为了保护广大人口的健康,是否应该期望贫穷和边缘化的人口,如劳工移民,在多大程度上和在多长时间内忍受痛苦和尊严侵犯。强调了背景政治在形成对跨界和公共卫生危机交叉性质的反应方面的作用。委员会还提请注意对侵犯尊严行为作出政治反应的可能性,因为这暴露了国家在保障其返回者移徙者的福祉方面的无能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信