A Comparison of Feature Extractors for Panorama Stitching in an Autonomous Car Architecture

Edgar Cortés-Gallardo, C. Moreno-García, Alfredo Zhu, Daniela. Chípuli-Silva, J. A. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Domenico. Morales-Ortiz, Sebastian Fernandez, Bernardo. Urriza, Juan. Valverde-López, Arath Marín, Hugo Pérez, J. Izquierdo-Reyes, Rogelio Bustamante-Bello
{"title":"A Comparison of Feature Extractors for Panorama Stitching in an Autonomous Car Architecture","authors":"Edgar Cortés-Gallardo, C. Moreno-García, Alfredo Zhu, Daniela. Chípuli-Silva, J. A. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Domenico. Morales-Ortiz, Sebastian Fernandez, Bernardo. Urriza, Juan. Valverde-López, Arath Marín, Hugo Pérez, J. Izquierdo-Reyes, Rogelio Bustamante-Bello","doi":"10.1109/ICMEAE.2019.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Panorama stitching consists on frames being merged to create a 360° view. This technique is proposed for its implementation in autonomous vehicles instead of the use of an external 360-degree camera, mostly due to its reduced cost and improved aerodynamics. This strategy requires a fast and robust set of features to be extracted from the images obtained by the cameras located around the inside of the car, in order to effectively compute the panoramic view in real time and avoid hazards on the road. This paper compares and creates discussion of three feature extraction methods (i.e. SIFT, BRISK and SURF) for image feature extraction, in order to decide which one is more suitable for a panorama stitching application in an autonomous car architecture. Experimental validation shows that SURF exhibits an improved performance under a variety of image transformations, and thus appears to be the most suitable of these three methods, given its accuracy when comparing features between both images, while maintaining a low time consumption. Furthermore, a comparison of the results obtained with respect to similar work allows us to increase the reliability of our methodology and the reach of our conclusions.","PeriodicalId":422872,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Mechatronics, Electronics and Automotive Engineering (ICMEAE)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Mechatronics, Electronics and Automotive Engineering (ICMEAE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMEAE.2019.00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Panorama stitching consists on frames being merged to create a 360° view. This technique is proposed for its implementation in autonomous vehicles instead of the use of an external 360-degree camera, mostly due to its reduced cost and improved aerodynamics. This strategy requires a fast and robust set of features to be extracted from the images obtained by the cameras located around the inside of the car, in order to effectively compute the panoramic view in real time and avoid hazards on the road. This paper compares and creates discussion of three feature extraction methods (i.e. SIFT, BRISK and SURF) for image feature extraction, in order to decide which one is more suitable for a panorama stitching application in an autonomous car architecture. Experimental validation shows that SURF exhibits an improved performance under a variety of image transformations, and thus appears to be the most suitable of these three methods, given its accuracy when comparing features between both images, while maintaining a low time consumption. Furthermore, a comparison of the results obtained with respect to similar work allows us to increase the reliability of our methodology and the reach of our conclusions.
自动驾驶汽车架构全景拼接特征提取器的比较
全景拼接包括将帧合并以创建360°视图。这项技术被提议用于自动驾驶汽车,而不是使用外部360度摄像头,主要是因为它降低了成本,改善了空气动力学。该策略要求从汽车内部周围的摄像头获得的图像中提取一组快速且鲁棒的特征,以便实时有效地计算全景视图并避免道路上的危险。本文对SIFT、BRISK和SURF三种图像特征提取方法进行了比较和讨论,以确定哪种方法更适合自动驾驶汽车架构中的全景拼接应用。实验验证表明,SURF在各种图像变换下表现出更好的性能,因此在比较两种图像特征时具有准确性,同时保持较低的时间消耗,似乎是这三种方法中最合适的。此外,对类似工作所获得的结果进行比较,使我们能够增加我们方法的可靠性和我们结论的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信