Performance Evaluation of Differential Privacy Mechanisms in Blockchain based Smart Metering

M. Hassan, M. H. Rehmani, Jinjun Chen
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Differential Privacy Mechanisms in Blockchain based Smart Metering","authors":"M. Hassan, M. H. Rehmani, Jinjun Chen","doi":"10.1049/pbpc029e_ch9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of differential privacy emerged as a strong notion to protect database privacy in an untrusted environment. Later on, researchers proposed several variants of differential privacy in order to preserve privacy in certain other scenarios, such as real-time cyber physical systems. Since then, differential privacy has rigorously been applied to certain other domains which has the need of privacy preservation. One such domain is decentralized blockchain based smart metering, in which smart meters acting as blockchain nodes sent their real-time data to grid utility databases for real-time reporting. This data is further used to carry out statistical tasks, such as load forecasting, demand response calculation, etc. However, in case if any intruder gets access to this data it can leak privacy of smart meter users. In this context, differential privacy can be used to protect privacy of this data. In this chapter, we carry out comparison of four variants of differential privacy (Laplace, Gaussian, Uniform, and Geometric) in blockchain based smart metering scenario. We test these variants on smart metering data and carry out their performance evaluation by varying different parameters. Experimental outcomes shows at low privacy budget ($\\varepsilon$) and at low reading sensitivity value ($\\delta$), these privacy preserving mechanisms provide high privacy by adding large amount of noise. However, among these four privacy preserving parameters Geometric parameters is more suitable for protecting high peak values and Laplace mechanism is more suitable for protecting low peak values at ($\\varepsilon$ = 0.01).","PeriodicalId":212774,"journal":{"name":"Blockchains for Network Security","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blockchains for Network Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/pbpc029e_ch9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The concept of differential privacy emerged as a strong notion to protect database privacy in an untrusted environment. Later on, researchers proposed several variants of differential privacy in order to preserve privacy in certain other scenarios, such as real-time cyber physical systems. Since then, differential privacy has rigorously been applied to certain other domains which has the need of privacy preservation. One such domain is decentralized blockchain based smart metering, in which smart meters acting as blockchain nodes sent their real-time data to grid utility databases for real-time reporting. This data is further used to carry out statistical tasks, such as load forecasting, demand response calculation, etc. However, in case if any intruder gets access to this data it can leak privacy of smart meter users. In this context, differential privacy can be used to protect privacy of this data. In this chapter, we carry out comparison of four variants of differential privacy (Laplace, Gaussian, Uniform, and Geometric) in blockchain based smart metering scenario. We test these variants on smart metering data and carry out their performance evaluation by varying different parameters. Experimental outcomes shows at low privacy budget ($\varepsilon$) and at low reading sensitivity value ($\delta$), these privacy preserving mechanisms provide high privacy by adding large amount of noise. However, among these four privacy preserving parameters Geometric parameters is more suitable for protecting high peak values and Laplace mechanism is more suitable for protecting low peak values at ($\varepsilon$ = 0.01).
基于区块链的智能计量中差分隐私机制的性能评估
差分隐私的概念作为在不可信环境中保护数据库隐私的一个强有力的概念而出现。后来,研究人员提出了几种差异隐私的变体,以便在某些其他场景(如实时网络物理系统)中保护隐私。此后,差分隐私被严格地应用于其他需要隐私保护的领域。其中一个领域是基于去中心化区块链的智能电表,其中智能电表作为区块链节点将其实时数据发送到电网公用事业数据库以进行实时报告。这些数据进一步用于执行统计任务,如负荷预测、需求响应计算等。然而,如果任何入侵者访问这些数据,它可能会泄露智能电表用户的隐私。在这种情况下,可以使用差分隐私来保护这些数据的隐私。在本章中,我们对基于区块链的智能计量场景中的四种差分隐私(拉普拉斯、高斯、均匀和几何)进行了比较。我们在智能计量数据上测试了这些变体,并通过改变不同的参数进行了性能评估。实验结果表明,在低隐私预算($\varepsilon$)和低读取灵敏度值($\delta$)下,这些隐私保护机制通过增加大量噪声来提供高隐私。但在这4个隐私保护参数中,几何参数更适合保护高峰值,拉普拉斯机制更适合保护低峰值($\varepsilon$ = 0.01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信