Liv Herzer, Annika Muecke, R. Richer, Nils C. Albrecht, Markus Heyder, Katharina M. Jaeger, Veronika Koenig, Alexander Koelpin, Nicolas Rohleder, Bjoern M. Eskofier
{"title":"Influence of Sensor Position and Body Movements on Radar-Based Heart Rate Monitoring","authors":"Liv Herzer, Annika Muecke, R. Richer, Nils C. Albrecht, Markus Heyder, Katharina M. Jaeger, Veronika Koenig, Alexander Koelpin, Nicolas Rohleder, Bjoern M. Eskofier","doi":"10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cardiac parameters are important indicators for health assessment. Radar-based monitoring with microwave interferometric sensors (MIS) is a promising alternative to conventional measurement methods, as it enables completely contactless cardiac function diagnostics. In this study, we evaluated the effects of sensor positioning and movement on the accuracy of radar-based heart rate measurements with MIS. For this purpose, we recruited 29 participants which performed semi-standardized movements, a reading task, and a standardized laboratory stress test in a seated position. Furthermore, we compared three different sensor positions (dorsal, upper pectoral, and lower pectoral) to a gold standard 1-channel wearable ECG sensor node. The dorsal positioning achieved the best results with a mean error (ME) of 0.2±5.4 bpm and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.5±4.1 bpm for no movement and also turned out to be most robust against motion artifacts with an overall ME of 0.1±14.1 bpm (MAE: 9.5±10.4 bpm). No correlation was found between movement intensity and measurement error. Instead, movement type and direction were identified as primary impact factors. This study provides a valuable contribution towards the applicability of radar-based vital sign monitoring with MIS in real-world scenarios. However, further research is needed to sufficiently prevent and compensate for movement artifacts.","PeriodicalId":347210,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BHI56158.2022.9926775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cardiac parameters are important indicators for health assessment. Radar-based monitoring with microwave interferometric sensors (MIS) is a promising alternative to conventional measurement methods, as it enables completely contactless cardiac function diagnostics. In this study, we evaluated the effects of sensor positioning and movement on the accuracy of radar-based heart rate measurements with MIS. For this purpose, we recruited 29 participants which performed semi-standardized movements, a reading task, and a standardized laboratory stress test in a seated position. Furthermore, we compared three different sensor positions (dorsal, upper pectoral, and lower pectoral) to a gold standard 1-channel wearable ECG sensor node. The dorsal positioning achieved the best results with a mean error (ME) of 0.2±5.4 bpm and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.5±4.1 bpm for no movement and also turned out to be most robust against motion artifacts with an overall ME of 0.1±14.1 bpm (MAE: 9.5±10.4 bpm). No correlation was found between movement intensity and measurement error. Instead, movement type and direction were identified as primary impact factors. This study provides a valuable contribution towards the applicability of radar-based vital sign monitoring with MIS in real-world scenarios. However, further research is needed to sufficiently prevent and compensate for movement artifacts.