Predicting Helpfulness of Crowd-Sourced Reviews: A Survey

M. Bilal, Mohsen Marjani, I. A. Hashem, Akibu Mahmoud Abdullahi, M. Tayyab, A. Gani
{"title":"Predicting Helpfulness of Crowd-Sourced Reviews: A Survey","authors":"M. Bilal, Mohsen Marjani, I. A. Hashem, Akibu Mahmoud Abdullahi, M. Tayyab, A. Gani","doi":"10.1109/MACS48846.2019.9024814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the recent advancement of Web 2.0 and the popularity of social media platforms, the volume of User Generated Content (UGC) is rising explosively. Online reviews are rapidly growing and a popular source of UGC, which help customers in evaluating the quality of product and making purchase decisions. However, distilling the required information from the massively increasing volume of reviews becomes difficult for customers. Therefore, it becomes an important issue to identify helpful review accurately. The review helpfulness prediction has attracted growing attention of researchers that proposed various solutions using statistical and Machine Learning (ML) techniques. This paper aims to review the existing literature on review helpfulness prediction, to identify data sources, ML techniques and potential challenges. The review helpfulness prediction was equally taken as both regression and classification task by previous studies. However, the definition of helpfulness for each task varies significantly. Most of the studies used online reviews from Amazon to predict helpfulness. The comparison of state-of-the-art techniques and challenges will give a quick overview to researchers about the existing state of research on review helpfulness prediction.","PeriodicalId":434612,"journal":{"name":"2019 13th International Conference on Mathematics, Actuarial Science, Computer Science and Statistics (MACS)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 13th International Conference on Mathematics, Actuarial Science, Computer Science and Statistics (MACS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MACS48846.2019.9024814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

With the recent advancement of Web 2.0 and the popularity of social media platforms, the volume of User Generated Content (UGC) is rising explosively. Online reviews are rapidly growing and a popular source of UGC, which help customers in evaluating the quality of product and making purchase decisions. However, distilling the required information from the massively increasing volume of reviews becomes difficult for customers. Therefore, it becomes an important issue to identify helpful review accurately. The review helpfulness prediction has attracted growing attention of researchers that proposed various solutions using statistical and Machine Learning (ML) techniques. This paper aims to review the existing literature on review helpfulness prediction, to identify data sources, ML techniques and potential challenges. The review helpfulness prediction was equally taken as both regression and classification task by previous studies. However, the definition of helpfulness for each task varies significantly. Most of the studies used online reviews from Amazon to predict helpfulness. The comparison of state-of-the-art techniques and challenges will give a quick overview to researchers about the existing state of research on review helpfulness prediction.
预测众包评论的有用性:一项调查
随着Web 2.0的发展和社交媒体平台的普及,用户生成内容(UGC)的数量呈爆炸式增长。在线评论正在迅速增长,并且是UGC的流行来源,它可以帮助客户评估产品质量并做出购买决定。然而,从大量增加的评论中提取所需的信息对客户来说变得很困难。因此,准确地识别有用的评论就成为一个重要的问题。综述性预测引起了越来越多的研究人员的关注,他们利用统计和机器学习(ML)技术提出了各种解决方案。本文旨在回顾现有的评论有用性预测的文献,以确定数据源,机器学习技术和潜在的挑战。以往的研究都将复习有用性预测视作回归任务和分类任务。然而,每个任务的有用性定义差别很大。大多数研究使用亚马逊的在线评论来预测是否有帮助。通过对最新技术和挑战的比较,可以让研究者对复习帮助预测的研究现状有一个快速的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信