Shifting Gears: Moving Colorado Away from Criminalizing Vehicle Residency and Towards Safe Parking

Nantiya Ruan, E. Zwiebel
{"title":"Shifting Gears: Moving Colorado Away from Criminalizing Vehicle Residency and Towards Safe Parking","authors":"Nantiya Ruan, E. Zwiebel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3917003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colorado is in the midst of a housing crisis, which has resulted in thousands of people experiencing homelessness. In 2020, the Point in Time survey recorded 9,846 individuals experiencing homelessness in Colorado. Of these individuals, 2,913 – nearly 30% – were unsheltered. Further, given the impending end of COVID-19 protections, such as the federal and state residential eviction moratoria and extended unemployment benefits, the number of those experiencing homelessness in Colorado is likely to rise in 2021 and 2022. Evictions from December 2020 to January 2021 were already on the rise, from 925 filings to 2,011 filings —a 218% increase.In response to the crisis, vehicles have become an affordable housing option for many. However, cities in Colorado have historically struggled to create sustainable solutions to aid those who are experiencing homelessness and living in their vehicles. Whether through misguided efforts to help, or pressure from housed communities and community members, cities too often have adopted new laws and regulations within their municipal codes that criminalize, rather than assist, these populations. This report focuses specifically on municipal ordinances that criminalize vehicle residency. This report undertakes a comprehensive review of the municipal codes in twenty cities selected based on their population and location: Arvada, Aurora, Boulder, Breckenridge, Broomfield, Colorado Springs, Craig, Denver, Durango, Fort Collins, Glenwood Springs, Golden, Grand Junction, Greeley, Lakewood, La Junta, Littleton, Longmont, Pueblo, and Thornton. These cities’ municipal codes were surveyed for key words relevant to vehicle residency and identified ordinances that were separated into five categories: (1) ordinances that prohibit the parking of large vehicles;(2) ordinances the prohibit inoperable, junk, or abandoned vehicles;(3) ordinances that prohibit parking for longer than 72 hours;(4) ordinances that outright prohibit sleeping or living in cars;and (5) regulations found in local zoning codes. Laws that prohibit parking large vehicles on public streets prevent individuals from living in an RV when they lose other forms of housing, which criminalizes vehicle residency. Laws that prohibit and impound junk, inoperable, and abandoned vehicles disallow individuals to create a home from a car that may not currently be operable, which criminalizes vehicle residency. Laws that prohibit parking on public streets for more than 24 to 72 hours force individuals to move locations frequently, which criminalizes vehicle residency. Laws that prohibit sleeping or living in vehicles prevent individuals from legally sleeping or living in their car, which directly criminalizes vehicle residency. Further, zoning codes frequently contain provisions that prohibit land uses not specifically permitted in a particular zone district, which, as may be interpreted, criminalize vehicle residency. This report analyzes identified ordinances from across the state, suggests how to change the laws to make them more amenable to vehicle residents, discusses the constitutionality of these laws, and concludes with a state-wide solution to vehicle residency through safe parking and the Colorado Safe Parking Initiative. Both municipalities within Colorado, and the state itself, must take action to ensure that the growing population of vehicle residents can find refuge and a safe place to rest.","PeriodicalId":114156,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Federalism & Sub-National Politics eJournal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Institutions: Federalism & Sub-National Politics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3917003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colorado is in the midst of a housing crisis, which has resulted in thousands of people experiencing homelessness. In 2020, the Point in Time survey recorded 9,846 individuals experiencing homelessness in Colorado. Of these individuals, 2,913 – nearly 30% – were unsheltered. Further, given the impending end of COVID-19 protections, such as the federal and state residential eviction moratoria and extended unemployment benefits, the number of those experiencing homelessness in Colorado is likely to rise in 2021 and 2022. Evictions from December 2020 to January 2021 were already on the rise, from 925 filings to 2,011 filings —a 218% increase.In response to the crisis, vehicles have become an affordable housing option for many. However, cities in Colorado have historically struggled to create sustainable solutions to aid those who are experiencing homelessness and living in their vehicles. Whether through misguided efforts to help, or pressure from housed communities and community members, cities too often have adopted new laws and regulations within their municipal codes that criminalize, rather than assist, these populations. This report focuses specifically on municipal ordinances that criminalize vehicle residency. This report undertakes a comprehensive review of the municipal codes in twenty cities selected based on their population and location: Arvada, Aurora, Boulder, Breckenridge, Broomfield, Colorado Springs, Craig, Denver, Durango, Fort Collins, Glenwood Springs, Golden, Grand Junction, Greeley, Lakewood, La Junta, Littleton, Longmont, Pueblo, and Thornton. These cities’ municipal codes were surveyed for key words relevant to vehicle residency and identified ordinances that were separated into five categories: (1) ordinances that prohibit the parking of large vehicles;(2) ordinances the prohibit inoperable, junk, or abandoned vehicles;(3) ordinances that prohibit parking for longer than 72 hours;(4) ordinances that outright prohibit sleeping or living in cars;and (5) regulations found in local zoning codes. Laws that prohibit parking large vehicles on public streets prevent individuals from living in an RV when they lose other forms of housing, which criminalizes vehicle residency. Laws that prohibit and impound junk, inoperable, and abandoned vehicles disallow individuals to create a home from a car that may not currently be operable, which criminalizes vehicle residency. Laws that prohibit parking on public streets for more than 24 to 72 hours force individuals to move locations frequently, which criminalizes vehicle residency. Laws that prohibit sleeping or living in vehicles prevent individuals from legally sleeping or living in their car, which directly criminalizes vehicle residency. Further, zoning codes frequently contain provisions that prohibit land uses not specifically permitted in a particular zone district, which, as may be interpreted, criminalize vehicle residency. This report analyzes identified ordinances from across the state, suggests how to change the laws to make them more amenable to vehicle residents, discusses the constitutionality of these laws, and concludes with a state-wide solution to vehicle residency through safe parking and the Colorado Safe Parking Initiative. Both municipalities within Colorado, and the state itself, must take action to ensure that the growing population of vehicle residents can find refuge and a safe place to rest.
换挡:让科罗拉多州远离对车辆居住的犯罪化,转向安全停车
科罗拉多州正处于住房危机之中,这导致成千上万的人无家可归。2020年,时间点调查记录了科罗拉多州9846名无家可归者。在这些人中,2913人——近30%——没有住所。此外,鉴于2019冠状病毒病保护措施即将结束,例如联邦和州的住宅驱逐暂停和延长失业救济金,科罗拉多州无家可归的人数可能会在2021年和2022年上升。从2020年12月到2021年1月,驱逐案件已经在增加,从925起增加到2011起,增长了218%。为了应对危机,汽车已成为许多人负担得起的住房选择。然而,科罗拉多州的城市一直在努力创造可持续的解决方案,以帮助那些无家可归、住在车里的人。无论是由于错误的帮助努力,还是来自收容社区和社区成员的压力,城市往往在其市政法规中采用新的法律法规,将这些人口定为犯罪,而不是给予帮助。本报告特别关注将车辆居住定为犯罪的市政条例。本报告对20个城市的市政法规进行了全面审查,这些城市是根据人口和位置选择的:阿瓦达、奥罗拉、博尔德、布雷肯里奇、布鲁姆菲尔德、科罗拉多斯普林斯、克雷格、丹佛、杜兰戈、柯林斯堡、格伦伍德斯普林斯、戈尔登、大枢纽、格里利、莱克伍德、拉Junta、利特尔顿、朗蒙特、普韦布洛和桑顿。我们调查了这些城市的市政法规中与车辆居住相关的关键词,并确定了以下五类法规:(1)禁止停放大型车辆的法规;(2)禁止不可用、垃圾或废弃车辆的法规;(3)禁止停放超过72小时的法规;(4)完全禁止在车内睡觉或居住的法规;(5)当地分区法规中的法规。禁止在公共街道上停放大型车辆的法律禁止个人在失去其他形式的住房时住在房车里,这将车辆居住定为犯罪。禁止和扣押垃圾、无法使用和废弃车辆的法律不允许个人从目前可能无法使用的汽车中创造一个家,这将车辆居住定为犯罪。禁止在公共街道上停车超过24至72小时的法律迫使个人经常搬家,这将车辆居住定为犯罪。禁止在车内睡觉或居住的法律禁止个人合法地在车内睡觉或居住,这直接将车内居住定为犯罪。此外,分区法规经常载有禁止在某一特定区域内未获特别许可的土地使用的规定,这可能被解释为将车辆居住定为犯罪。本报告分析了全州已确定的法令,建议如何修改法律使其更适合车辆居民,讨论了这些法律的合宪性,并通过安全停车和科罗拉多安全停车倡议提出了全州范围内的车辆居民解决方案。科罗拉多州的市政当局和该州本身都必须采取行动,确保不断增长的车辆居民能够找到避难所和安全的休息场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信