The Impact of Non-Tariff Measures on Sri Lankan Tea Trade: A Bayesian Inference of the Gravity Model

K. Ranjan, J. Edirisinghe
{"title":"The Impact of Non-Tariff Measures on Sri Lankan Tea Trade: A Bayesian Inference of the Gravity Model","authors":"K. Ranjan, J. Edirisinghe","doi":"10.4038/sjae.v21i1.4637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sri Lankan tea industry is confronting the danger of losing key markets on the grounds of exceeding the Maximum Residual Levels (MRLs) in chemicals permitted by the European Union. This study assesses the impact of Non-tariff measures on Sri Lankan tea exports because of MRLs stipulated for the pesticide, Endosulfan. This study employs a Bayesian version of the Gravity equation using a Multi-level Mixed Model, because of the additional advantages that Bayesian analysis provides. Panel data from 2003 to 2017 for fourteen prime destinations of Ceylon tea were considered for this study. The estimated coefficient of MLR for Endosulfan suggests that a 1% increase in the regulatory stringency on Endosulfan (tighter restrictions on pesticide) can result in a 0.67% (approximately US$ 8,907,708.15 in 2020) decrease and a 1% increase in the tariff rate is prompt to a 0.03% (approximately US$ 398, 852.60 in 2020) decline in the value of tea exports. Compared to the tariff, the MRL is associated with a higher impact on trade. Therefore, the negative impact of MRLs is found to outweigh the impact of import tariffs, highlighting the greater role that non-tariff measures play.","PeriodicalId":318491,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lankan Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sjae.v21i1.4637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sri Lankan tea industry is confronting the danger of losing key markets on the grounds of exceeding the Maximum Residual Levels (MRLs) in chemicals permitted by the European Union. This study assesses the impact of Non-tariff measures on Sri Lankan tea exports because of MRLs stipulated for the pesticide, Endosulfan. This study employs a Bayesian version of the Gravity equation using a Multi-level Mixed Model, because of the additional advantages that Bayesian analysis provides. Panel data from 2003 to 2017 for fourteen prime destinations of Ceylon tea were considered for this study. The estimated coefficient of MLR for Endosulfan suggests that a 1% increase in the regulatory stringency on Endosulfan (tighter restrictions on pesticide) can result in a 0.67% (approximately US$ 8,907,708.15 in 2020) decrease and a 1% increase in the tariff rate is prompt to a 0.03% (approximately US$ 398, 852.60 in 2020) decline in the value of tea exports. Compared to the tariff, the MRL is associated with a higher impact on trade. Therefore, the negative impact of MRLs is found to outweigh the impact of import tariffs, highlighting the greater role that non-tariff measures play.
非关税措施对斯里兰卡茶叶贸易的影响:重力模型的贝叶斯推断
斯里兰卡茶业正面临着失去主要市场的危险,原因是化学品的最大残留水平超过了欧盟允许的最高残留水平。本研究评估了非关税措施对斯里兰卡茶叶出口的影响,因为农药硫丹规定了最大限量。由于贝叶斯分析提供的额外优势,本研究采用了多级混合模型的贝叶斯重力方程。本研究考虑了2003年至2017年14个锡兰茶主要目的地的面板数据。硫丹的MLR估计系数表明,对硫丹的监管严格程度提高1%(对农药的限制更严格)可导致0.67%(2020年约为8,907,708.15美元)的下降,关税税率提高1%可导致茶叶出口价值下降0.03%(2020年约为398,852.60美元)。与关税相比,MRL对贸易的影响更大。因此,我们发现MRLs的负面影响超过了进口关税的影响,凸显了非关税措施发挥的更大作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信