Comparison of Scheduling Methods for Optimization Production Processes on PT. P

Alifa Izzan Akhsani, R. Sarno, Dwi Sunaryono, Tantya A. Giranita, K. R. Sungkono
{"title":"Comparison of Scheduling Methods for Optimization Production Processes on PT. P","authors":"Alifa Izzan Akhsani, R. Sarno, Dwi Sunaryono, Tantya A. Giranita, K. R. Sungkono","doi":"10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine scheduling methods to optimize the manufacturing production process. One of which way to optimize the manufacturing process is to ensure that the production capacity is used optimally. Scheduling planning is a tool to allocate capacity and resources for the process from time to time. The author proposes the earliest due date (EDD) scheduling method to be compared with critical ratio (CR) and first come first serve (FCFS) method for optimizing the manufacturing production process on PT.P. Several tests are conducted to prove the performance of the scheduling method, with regard to scheduling parameters and their impact on the manufacturing production process. The scheduling parameters referred to are Flow Time, Makespan, Tardiness, and Late Jobs. For its effect on the manufacturing production process, the utility value of the machine capacity used will be measured while using the scheduling method. The test results obtained from the earliest due date method (EDD) succeeded in producing the value of makespan 3.41% shorter, and the mean flow time is 0.70% shorter. This method also improved the utility of the machine, on average 2.34% better than other methods without increasing the mean tardiness and the number of late jobs overall.","PeriodicalId":345558,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to determine scheduling methods to optimize the manufacturing production process. One of which way to optimize the manufacturing process is to ensure that the production capacity is used optimally. Scheduling planning is a tool to allocate capacity and resources for the process from time to time. The author proposes the earliest due date (EDD) scheduling method to be compared with critical ratio (CR) and first come first serve (FCFS) method for optimizing the manufacturing production process on PT.P. Several tests are conducted to prove the performance of the scheduling method, with regard to scheduling parameters and their impact on the manufacturing production process. The scheduling parameters referred to are Flow Time, Makespan, Tardiness, and Late Jobs. For its effect on the manufacturing production process, the utility value of the machine capacity used will be measured while using the scheduling method. The test results obtained from the earliest due date method (EDD) succeeded in producing the value of makespan 3.41% shorter, and the mean flow time is 0.70% shorter. This method also improved the utility of the machine, on average 2.34% better than other methods without increasing the mean tardiness and the number of late jobs overall.
PT. P生产过程优化调度方法的比较
本研究旨在确定优化制造生产过程的调度方法。优化生产过程的方法之一就是保证生产能力得到最优的利用。调度计划是不时为流程分配容量和资源的工具。提出了最早到期日(EDD)调度方法,并将其与临界比(CR)和先到先得(FCFS)方法进行比较,以优化生产过程。针对调度参数及其对制造生产过程的影响,对调度方法的性能进行了验证。调度参数包括“Flow Time”、“Makespan”、“Tardiness”和“Late Jobs”。由于其对制造生产过程的影响,在使用调度方法时,将测量所使用的机器容量的效用值。采用最早到期日法(EDD)的试验结果成功地使makespan值缩短了3.41%,平均流动时间缩短了0.70%。该方法还提高了机器的利用率,在不增加平均延迟和延迟作业总数的情况下,比其他方法平均提高2.34%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信