The Importance of Operational Accounts in African Military History

Timothy J. Stapleton
{"title":"The Importance of Operational Accounts in African Military History","authors":"Timothy J. Stapleton","doi":"10.1163/24680966-00502004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue of the Journal of African Military History presents two articles on South Africa that demonstrate the continued importance of original research on operational history. In addition, they both highlight the important Clausewitzian point about the unpredictability of war including wars that, with hindsight, appear to have been one-sided. Michał Leśniewski looks at the Battle of Thukela, a hitherto little-known engagement between the forces of the Zulu Kingdom and the autonomous British colonial enclave of Port Natal (now the city of Durban) that allied with the Boers during the Boer-Zulu conflict of 1838. Based on archival material from South Africa and Britain, and Zulu oral accounts recorded in the early twentieth century, Leśniewski highlights Zulu commander Nongalaza kaNondela’s improvisation of standard Zulu envelopment tactics that enabled his men to overcome a colonial-led force of around 500 gunmen supported by several thousand traditionally equipped warriors. The Boer-Zulu war is best remembered for its start with the Zulu killing of Boer leader Piet Retief in February 1838 and the climactic Battle of Blood River in December that resulted in the annihilation of an attacking Zulu army by the firepower of a Boer defensive wagon laager. Despite the retrospective sense of inevitable Zulu defeat evokedby the overwhelming historicalmemory of Blood River, commemorated by an apartheid era public holiday known as the “Day of the Vow” and by a large monument erected on the site both of which celebrated and justified white supremacy, the earlier actions in the war favoured the Zulu. From the perspective of April 1838, the outcome of the warmust have seemeduncertain given that Zuluwarriorswith spears, axes and clubs defeated colonial trainedmusketeers at Thukela and then successfully ambushed a Boer mounted force eventually dubbed the “Flight Commando.” With similar hindsight, the result of the South African invasion of German South West Africa (Namibia today) during the early part of the First World","PeriodicalId":143855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Military History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Military History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24680966-00502004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This issue of the Journal of African Military History presents two articles on South Africa that demonstrate the continued importance of original research on operational history. In addition, they both highlight the important Clausewitzian point about the unpredictability of war including wars that, with hindsight, appear to have been one-sided. Michał Leśniewski looks at the Battle of Thukela, a hitherto little-known engagement between the forces of the Zulu Kingdom and the autonomous British colonial enclave of Port Natal (now the city of Durban) that allied with the Boers during the Boer-Zulu conflict of 1838. Based on archival material from South Africa and Britain, and Zulu oral accounts recorded in the early twentieth century, Leśniewski highlights Zulu commander Nongalaza kaNondela’s improvisation of standard Zulu envelopment tactics that enabled his men to overcome a colonial-led force of around 500 gunmen supported by several thousand traditionally equipped warriors. The Boer-Zulu war is best remembered for its start with the Zulu killing of Boer leader Piet Retief in February 1838 and the climactic Battle of Blood River in December that resulted in the annihilation of an attacking Zulu army by the firepower of a Boer defensive wagon laager. Despite the retrospective sense of inevitable Zulu defeat evokedby the overwhelming historicalmemory of Blood River, commemorated by an apartheid era public holiday known as the “Day of the Vow” and by a large monument erected on the site both of which celebrated and justified white supremacy, the earlier actions in the war favoured the Zulu. From the perspective of April 1838, the outcome of the warmust have seemeduncertain given that Zuluwarriorswith spears, axes and clubs defeated colonial trainedmusketeers at Thukela and then successfully ambushed a Boer mounted force eventually dubbed the “Flight Commando.” With similar hindsight, the result of the South African invasion of German South West Africa (Namibia today) during the early part of the First World
非洲军事史上作战记录的重要性
这一期的《非洲军事史杂志》提出了两篇关于南非的文章,证明了对作战历史进行原创性研究的持续重要性。此外,他们都强调了克劳塞维茨关于战争不可预测性的重要观点,包括事后看来似乎是一边倒的战争。michaowLeśniewski着眼于图克拉战役,这是一场迄今为止鲜为人知的祖鲁王国和自治的英国殖民地纳塔尔港(现在的德班市)之间的战斗,在1838年布尔-祖鲁冲突期间与布尔人结盟。根据来自南非和英国的档案资料,以及祖鲁人在20世纪早期的口述记录,Leśniewski重点介绍了祖鲁指挥官Nongalaza kaNondela对祖鲁人标准包围战术的即兴发挥,使他的士兵战胜了由数千名传统装备战士支持的约500名枪手组成的殖民地军队。布尔-祖鲁战争最令人难忘的是,它始于1838年2月祖鲁人杀死布尔领导人皮特·雷蒂夫,以及12月的血河之战,结果是进攻的祖鲁军队被布尔防御马车的火力歼灭。尽管祖鲁人不可避免的失败是由血河的历史记忆唤起的,被种族隔离时代的公共假日称为“誓言日”来纪念,并在遗址上竖立了一座巨大的纪念碑,庆祝和证明白人至上主义,但战争早期的行动有利于祖鲁人。从1838年4月的角度来看,这场战争的结果似乎是不确定的,因为祖鲁战士用长矛、斧头和棍棒在图克拉击败了殖民地训练有素的火枪手,然后成功伏击了一支最终被称为“飞行突击队”的布尔骑兵团。类似的后见之明,是南非在第一世界早期入侵德属西南非洲(今天的纳米比亚)的结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信