Clinical results of stenting for cervical internal carotid stenoses.

M. Tsuura, T. Terada, H. Matsumoto, O. Masuo, T. Itakura, G. Hyoutani, Y. Nakamura, T. Nishiguchi, H. Moriwaki, S. Hayashi
{"title":"Clinical results of stenting for cervical internal carotid stenoses.","authors":"M. Tsuura, T. Terada, H. Matsumoto, O. Masuo, T. Itakura, G. Hyoutani, Y. Nakamura, T. Nishiguchi, H. Moriwaki, S. Hayashi","doi":"10.2335/SCS.31.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY\nTotal 89 patients with cervical ICA stenosis were treated by stenting. In 74 cases of stenting, we used our blocking balloon systems to prevent distal embolism. The morbidity and the mortality rate was 4.5% and 0%, respectively.Two(3%) of 74 cases showed distal embolism when blocking balloon catheter systems(BBCS) were used, while distal embolism occurred in four (27%) of 15 cases of stenting without BBCS. On diffusion- weighted MRI (DWI), hyperintense areas were detected in seven (47%) of 15 lesions when we used BBCS only during postdilatation. On the other hand, use of BBCS during predilatation as well as postdilatation reduced hyperintense areas on DWI, which were detected in three (25%) of 12 patients. Our blocking balloon catheter system is a useful device to reduce the risk of distal embolism, especially when we use it during not only postdilatation but predilatation.","PeriodicalId":126264,"journal":{"name":"Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2335/SCS.31.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

SUMMARY Total 89 patients with cervical ICA stenosis were treated by stenting. In 74 cases of stenting, we used our blocking balloon systems to prevent distal embolism. The morbidity and the mortality rate was 4.5% and 0%, respectively.Two(3%) of 74 cases showed distal embolism when blocking balloon catheter systems(BBCS) were used, while distal embolism occurred in four (27%) of 15 cases of stenting without BBCS. On diffusion- weighted MRI (DWI), hyperintense areas were detected in seven (47%) of 15 lesions when we used BBCS only during postdilatation. On the other hand, use of BBCS during predilatation as well as postdilatation reduced hyperintense areas on DWI, which were detected in three (25%) of 12 patients. Our blocking balloon catheter system is a useful device to reduce the risk of distal embolism, especially when we use it during not only postdilatation but predilatation.
颈内动脉狭窄支架置入术的临床效果。
总结:89例颈ICA狭窄患者采用支架置入术治疗。在74例支架置入术中,我们使用我们的阻塞球囊系统来防止远端栓塞。74例中有2例(3%)采用阻断球囊导管系统(BBCS), 15例中有4例(27%)不采用球囊导管系统(BBCS)。在扩散加权MRI (DWI)上,当我们仅在扩张后使用BBCS时,15个病变中有7个(47%)检测到高信号区域。另一方面,在扩张前和扩张后使用BBCS可减少DWI上的高信号区域,12例患者中有3例(25%)检测到高信号区域。我们的阻塞球囊导管系统是一种有效的设备,以减少远端栓塞的风险,特别是当我们不仅在扩张后,而且在扩张前使用它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信