Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance

Barbara J. Flood
{"title":"Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance","authors":"Barbara J. Flood","doi":"10.2307/40322085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TEACHING INVOLVES a continuing self-awareness and critical review of procedures. This is especially true at the graduate level where student maturity, experience, and motivation challenge the instructor. There is a danger of what I like to call the \"god complex\" because one is the final arbiter and authority. Getting valid and reliable feedback from students is difficult. Verbal responses by students are likely to be skewed because of the tendency for talkative students to talk and quiet students to be quiet. Few students are likely to strongly criticize a teacher to his face before the final grades are in. Some students may compliment teachers to try to influence the teacher's attitude to them. And who of us is totally lacking positive response to praise? I would like to report a feedback technique that I have been using at the Graduate School of Library Science, Drexel Institute of Technology. It is an anonymous, written, open-ended questionnaire administered in the last session of class after the students have received their term grades. (It is my custom to give term grades at the beginning of the last session.) The general questions follow:","PeriodicalId":256869,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education for librarianship","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of education for librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40322085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

TEACHING INVOLVES a continuing self-awareness and critical review of procedures. This is especially true at the graduate level where student maturity, experience, and motivation challenge the instructor. There is a danger of what I like to call the "god complex" because one is the final arbiter and authority. Getting valid and reliable feedback from students is difficult. Verbal responses by students are likely to be skewed because of the tendency for talkative students to talk and quiet students to be quiet. Few students are likely to strongly criticize a teacher to his face before the final grades are in. Some students may compliment teachers to try to influence the teacher's attitude to them. And who of us is totally lacking positive response to praise? I would like to report a feedback technique that I have been using at the Graduate School of Library Science, Drexel Institute of Technology. It is an anonymous, written, open-ended questionnaire administered in the last session of class after the students have received their term grades. (It is my custom to give term grades at the beginning of the last session.) The general questions follow:
学生评价教师的表现
教学包括持续的自我意识和对程序的批判性审查。在研究生阶段尤其如此,因为学生的成熟度、经验和动机都对教师构成了挑战。这里有一种我喜欢称之为“上帝情结”的危险,因为一个人是最终的仲裁者和权威。从学生那里得到有效和可靠的反馈是很困难的。学生们的口头反应很可能是扭曲的,因为健谈的学生倾向于说话,安静的学生倾向于安静。在期末成绩出来之前,很少有学生会当面强烈批评老师。有些学生可能会称赞老师,试图影响老师对他们的态度。我们当中有谁对赞美完全没有积极的反应呢?我想报告我在德雷塞尔理工学院图书馆学研究生院一直使用的一种反馈技术。这是一份匿名的、书面的、开放式的问卷,在学生拿到学期成绩后的最后一堂课上进行。(我的习惯是在最后一节课开始时给出学期成绩。)一般性问题如下:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信