{"title":"Co-evolved genetic programs for stock market trading","authors":"Jason F. Nicholls, Andries P. Engelbrecht","doi":"10.1002/isaf.1458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The profitability of trading rules evolved by three different optimised genetic programs, namely a single population genetic program (GP), a co-operative co-evolved GP, and a competitive co-evolved GP is compared. Profitability is determined by trading thirteen listed shares on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) over a period of April 2003 to June 2008. An empirical study presented here shows that GPs can generate profitable trading rules across a variety of industries and market conditions. The results show that the co-operative co-evolved GP generates trading rules perform significantly worse than a single population GP and a competitively co-evolved GP. The results also show that a competitive co-evolved GP and the single population GP produce similar trading rules. The profits returned by the evolved trading rules are compared to the profit returned by the buy-and-hold trading strategy. The evolved trading rules significantly outperform the buy-and-hold strategy when the market trends downwards. No significant difference is identified among the buy-and-hold strategy, the competitive co-evolved GP, and single population GP when the market trends upwards.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53473,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management","volume":"26 3","pages":"117-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/isaf.1458","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/isaf.1458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The profitability of trading rules evolved by three different optimised genetic programs, namely a single population genetic program (GP), a co-operative co-evolved GP, and a competitive co-evolved GP is compared. Profitability is determined by trading thirteen listed shares on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) over a period of April 2003 to June 2008. An empirical study presented here shows that GPs can generate profitable trading rules across a variety of industries and market conditions. The results show that the co-operative co-evolved GP generates trading rules perform significantly worse than a single population GP and a competitively co-evolved GP. The results also show that a competitive co-evolved GP and the single population GP produce similar trading rules. The profits returned by the evolved trading rules are compared to the profit returned by the buy-and-hold trading strategy. The evolved trading rules significantly outperform the buy-and-hold strategy when the market trends downwards. No significant difference is identified among the buy-and-hold strategy, the competitive co-evolved GP, and single population GP when the market trends upwards.
期刊介绍:
Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management is a quarterly international journal which publishes original, high quality material dealing with all aspects of intelligent systems as they relate to the fields of accounting, economics, finance, marketing and management. In addition, the journal also is concerned with related emerging technologies, including big data, business intelligence, social media and other technologies. It encourages the development of novel technologies, and the embedding of new and existing technologies into applications of real, practical value. Therefore, implementation issues are of as much concern as development issues. The journal is designed to appeal to academics in the intelligent systems, emerging technologies and business fields, as well as to advanced practitioners who wish to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, or economy of their working practices. A special feature of the journal is the use of two groups of reviewers, those who specialize in intelligent systems work, and also those who specialize in applications areas. Reviewers are asked to address issues of originality and actual or potential impact on research, teaching, or practice in the accounting, finance, or management fields. Authors working on conceptual developments or on laboratory-based explorations of data sets therefore need to address the issue of potential impact at some level in submissions to the journal.