Impacts of Nile tilapia cage culture on water and bottom sediment quality: The ability of an eutrophic lake to absorb and dilute perturbations

Q3 Environmental Science
Safina Musa, Christopher Mulanda Aura, Tumi Tomasson, Ólafur Sigurgeirsson, Helgi Thorarensen
{"title":"Impacts of Nile tilapia cage culture on water and bottom sediment quality: The ability of an eutrophic lake to absorb and dilute perturbations","authors":"Safina Musa,&nbsp;Christopher Mulanda Aura,&nbsp;Tumi Tomasson,&nbsp;Ólafur Sigurgeirsson,&nbsp;Helgi Thorarensen","doi":"10.1111/lre.12413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmentally sustainable aquaculture depends on accurate understanding of the impacts of aquaculture-derived organic matter (AOM) and the ability of aquaculture systems to absorb and dilute perturbations. To this end, the present study assessed the impacts of AOM from cage culture of Nile tilapia on the ecology of Lake Victoria, Kenya, using fish cages near Anyanga Beach in Siaya County from December 2018 to October 2019. Four locations were surveyed for organic loadings from cage cultures, located 0, 50, 150 and 500 m (as a control site) away from the cages. The cage aquaculture produced increased P and N concentrations near the cages and a decreased N:P molar ratio. These changes stimulated algal growth which, in turn, affected the water quality. The organic material accumulated on the bottom under the cages, increasing the benthic BOD (BOD, &gt;10 mg/g), a sensitive indicator of the ecological footprint of the cage aquaculture. Further, the negative ORP observed in the benthic layer suggested anoxic bacterial metabolism, possibly causing build-up of sulphides and methane. These changes altered the abundance and composition of both limnetic and benthic communities. At the beginning of the study, 22 zoobenthic taxa existed around the cages and 18 at the reference sites. Only 3 saprophilous taxa, chiefly gastropods (<i>Physella</i> spp.), bivalves (<i>Sphaerium</i> spp<i>.</i>) and oligochaetes (<i>Tubifex</i> spp.) were present at the cage site and 17 at the reference site at the end of the culture period. The Shannon diversity index exhibited a declining tendency with the length of culture period at the cage site, signifying a negative impact of aquaculture on biodiversity. The water quality recovery after cage disturbance is rapid (&lt;4 months), noting there was no significant difference in the water quality recorded at the cage site and the other sampling sites after a fallow period of 4 months. However, the recovery of the sediment and meiofauna was far from complete at the end of this period. Moving the cages slightly (50–100 m) away from the former location may allow the benthic communities to recover and alleviate the problem. Further, the fallowing period, particularly for the Anyanga Beach site, should be extended from four to at least 5 months to allow for the environment to recover. With the rapid increase of cage fish farming in the African Great Lakes Region and with the potential for its occurrence in other lakes, there is a need to develop regulations to guide the industry, as well as the need for continuous monitoring of the environment, in order to provide information to guide investments and ensure sustainable cage farming.</p>","PeriodicalId":39473,"journal":{"name":"Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lre.12413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Environmentally sustainable aquaculture depends on accurate understanding of the impacts of aquaculture-derived organic matter (AOM) and the ability of aquaculture systems to absorb and dilute perturbations. To this end, the present study assessed the impacts of AOM from cage culture of Nile tilapia on the ecology of Lake Victoria, Kenya, using fish cages near Anyanga Beach in Siaya County from December 2018 to October 2019. Four locations were surveyed for organic loadings from cage cultures, located 0, 50, 150 and 500 m (as a control site) away from the cages. The cage aquaculture produced increased P and N concentrations near the cages and a decreased N:P molar ratio. These changes stimulated algal growth which, in turn, affected the water quality. The organic material accumulated on the bottom under the cages, increasing the benthic BOD (BOD, >10 mg/g), a sensitive indicator of the ecological footprint of the cage aquaculture. Further, the negative ORP observed in the benthic layer suggested anoxic bacterial metabolism, possibly causing build-up of sulphides and methane. These changes altered the abundance and composition of both limnetic and benthic communities. At the beginning of the study, 22 zoobenthic taxa existed around the cages and 18 at the reference sites. Only 3 saprophilous taxa, chiefly gastropods (Physella spp.), bivalves (Sphaerium spp.) and oligochaetes (Tubifex spp.) were present at the cage site and 17 at the reference site at the end of the culture period. The Shannon diversity index exhibited a declining tendency with the length of culture period at the cage site, signifying a negative impact of aquaculture on biodiversity. The water quality recovery after cage disturbance is rapid (<4 months), noting there was no significant difference in the water quality recorded at the cage site and the other sampling sites after a fallow period of 4 months. However, the recovery of the sediment and meiofauna was far from complete at the end of this period. Moving the cages slightly (50–100 m) away from the former location may allow the benthic communities to recover and alleviate the problem. Further, the fallowing period, particularly for the Anyanga Beach site, should be extended from four to at least 5 months to allow for the environment to recover. With the rapid increase of cage fish farming in the African Great Lakes Region and with the potential for its occurrence in other lakes, there is a need to develop regulations to guide the industry, as well as the need for continuous monitoring of the environment, in order to provide information to guide investments and ensure sustainable cage farming.

尼罗罗非鱼网箱养殖对水和底泥质量的影响:富营养化湖泊吸收和稀释扰动的能力
环境上可持续的水产养殖取决于对水产养殖产生的有机物(AOM)影响的准确理解以及水产养殖系统吸收和稀释扰动的能力。为此,本研究于2018年12月至2019年10月在肯尼亚Siaya县Anyanga海滩附近使用网箱,评估了尼罗罗非鱼网箱养殖产生的AOM对维多利亚湖生态的影响。调查了四个地点,分别位于距离笼子0、50、150和500米(作为对照地点)的网箱培养物的有机负荷。网箱养殖提高了网箱附近的磷和氮浓度,降低了N:P摩尔比。这些变化刺激了藻类的生长,反过来又影响了水质。笼下底部的有机物积累,增加了底栖生物需氧量(BOD, 10 mg/g),这是网箱养殖生态足迹的敏感指标。此外,在底栖层观察到的负ORP表明细菌缺氧代谢,可能导致硫化物和甲烷的积聚。这些变化改变了沼泽和底栖生物群落的丰度和组成。研究开始时,笼子周围有22种底栖动物类群,参考点有18种。培养期结束时,笼点只存在3个腐生类群,主要是腹足类(Physella spp)、双壳类(Sphaerium spp)和寡毛纲(Tubifex spp),参考点有17个。Shannon多样性指数随网箱养殖时间的延长呈下降趋势,表明养殖对生物多样性有负面影响。干扰笼后的水质恢复很快(4个月),注意到在4个月的休耕期后,笼点和其他采样点的水质记录没有显著差异。然而,在这一时期结束时,沉积物和微量动物的恢复还远远没有完成。将网箱从原来的位置稍微移动(50-100米)可以使底栖生物群落恢复并缓解问题。此外,休养期,特别是安雁岗海滩的休养期,应从4个月延长至至少5个月,以使环境得以恢复。随着网箱养鱼在非洲大湖地区的迅速增加,以及在其他湖泊发生网箱养鱼的可能性,有必要制定法规来指导该行业,并需要对环境进行持续监测,以便提供信息来指导投资和确保可持续的网箱养鱼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management
Lakes and Reservoirs: Research and Management Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management aims to promote environmentally sound management of natural and artificial lakes, consistent with sustainable development policies. This peer-reviewed Journal publishes international research on the management and conservation of lakes and reservoirs to facilitate the international exchange of results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信