Comparing delayed versus on-arrival administration of a modified live viral vaccine in feedlot cattle

A. Ambs, H. Moberly, S. Capik
{"title":"Comparing delayed versus on-arrival administration of a modified live viral vaccine in feedlot cattle","authors":"A. Ambs, H. Moberly, S. Capik","doi":"10.18849/ve.v7i2.502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PICO question \nIn auction market calves at high risk of developing bovine respiratory disease (BRD), does delayed (14–30 days) vaccination with a modified live vaccine (MLV) for viral respiratory pathogens versus administration of MLV on-arrival (within 24 hours of arrival) to the feedlot, result in a decreased percentage of calves with BRD morbidity diagnosed based on visual signs and rectal temperature >40 degrees Celsius? \n  \nClinical bottom line \nCategory of research question \nTreatment \nThe number and type of study designs reviewed \nTwo papers were critically reviewed. Both are randomised complete block designs \nStrength of evidence \nWeak \nOutcomes reported \nDelaying administration of a modified live respiratory vaccine to feedlot cattle may result in lower BRD retreatments \nConclusion \nIn feedlot calves, delaying modified live vaccine administration for viral respiratory pathogens may result in lower BRD retreatment rates than cattle receiving the vaccine on arrival to the feedlot. Significant statistical data from one study supported this conclusion while another showed numerically less retreatments in calves vaccinated on arrival versus delayed vaccination \n  \nHow to apply this evidence in practice \nThe application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. \nKnowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care. \n  \n","PeriodicalId":257905,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Evidence","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v7i2.502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PICO question In auction market calves at high risk of developing bovine respiratory disease (BRD), does delayed (14–30 days) vaccination with a modified live vaccine (MLV) for viral respiratory pathogens versus administration of MLV on-arrival (within 24 hours of arrival) to the feedlot, result in a decreased percentage of calves with BRD morbidity diagnosed based on visual signs and rectal temperature >40 degrees Celsius?   Clinical bottom line Category of research question Treatment The number and type of study designs reviewed Two papers were critically reviewed. Both are randomised complete block designs Strength of evidence Weak Outcomes reported Delaying administration of a modified live respiratory vaccine to feedlot cattle may result in lower BRD retreatments Conclusion In feedlot calves, delaying modified live vaccine administration for viral respiratory pathogens may result in lower BRD retreatment rates than cattle receiving the vaccine on arrival to the feedlot. Significant statistical data from one study supported this conclusion while another showed numerically less retreatments in calves vaccinated on arrival versus delayed vaccination   How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.  
改良病毒活疫苗在饲养场牛的延迟和到货注射比较
在拍卖市场上发生牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)高风险的小牛中,延迟(14-30天)接种针对病毒性呼吸道病原体的改良活疫苗(MLV),与到达饲养场后(到达饲养场后24小时内)接种MLV相比,是否会降低根据视觉体征和直肠温度>40摄氏度诊断出BRD发病率的小牛百分比?临床底线研究问题类别治疗研究设计审查的数量和类型两篇论文被严格审查。两者均为随机完全区组设计证据强度弱结果报告延迟对饲养场牛接种改良呼吸活疫苗可能导致BRD复疗率降低结论在饲养场小牛中,延迟对病毒性呼吸道病原体接种改良活疫苗可能导致BRD复疗率低于到达饲养场后接种疫苗的牛。一项研究的重要统计数据支持了这一结论,而另一项研究显示,与延迟接种疫苗相比,抵达后接种疫苗的小牛在数字上的再治疗较少。如何将这一证据应用于实践?个人的临床专业知识,病人的情况和业主的价值观,你工作的国家,地点或诊所,你面前的个案,治疗和资源的可用性。知识摘要是帮助加强或告知决策的资源。他们不会凌驾于从业者的责任或判断之上,去做对他们照顾的动物最好的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信