{"title":"The White Gaze: Critical Reflections on the East-West Dichotomy","authors":"N. Deka","doi":"10.46700/asssr/2020/v2/i1/196111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his much quoted verse above Rudyard Kipling revealed something of the nucleus of the long-lived tradition of Orientalist thought. According to J.J. Clarke, the ambivalence of the West towards the East is age-old. This ambivalence largely stems from the difference in religion and culture that the two poles share. Religion, an act of cultural construction circulates in a particular form and culture thereby, can be said to be a definer of character. Every culture thus develops its own particular values and beliefs. Elucidating this concept further, the paper intends to examine this thought by applying Said’s study of Orientalism to hegemonically Western discourse about the East and seek to highlight the fact that the East-West dichotomy is a result of ‘selective cultural mapping’, a deliberate attempt to alienate the East. To lay bare the East-West dichotomy and highlight the West’s selective cultural mapping of the East, the paper will analyze E.M Forster’s A Passage to India (1924) and its movie adaptation by David Lean and will do a comparative study. Furthermore, I will concentrate on highlighting the West’s fear of islamophobia and the consequences arising from it with due reference to the movie Khuda Ke Liye (2007), a Pakistani Urdu movie by Shoaib Mansoor.","PeriodicalId":132109,"journal":{"name":"Asiatic Society for Social Science Research (ASSSR)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asiatic Society for Social Science Research (ASSSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46700/asssr/2020/v2/i1/196111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In his much quoted verse above Rudyard Kipling revealed something of the nucleus of the long-lived tradition of Orientalist thought. According to J.J. Clarke, the ambivalence of the West towards the East is age-old. This ambivalence largely stems from the difference in religion and culture that the two poles share. Religion, an act of cultural construction circulates in a particular form and culture thereby, can be said to be a definer of character. Every culture thus develops its own particular values and beliefs. Elucidating this concept further, the paper intends to examine this thought by applying Said’s study of Orientalism to hegemonically Western discourse about the East and seek to highlight the fact that the East-West dichotomy is a result of ‘selective cultural mapping’, a deliberate attempt to alienate the East. To lay bare the East-West dichotomy and highlight the West’s selective cultural mapping of the East, the paper will analyze E.M Forster’s A Passage to India (1924) and its movie adaptation by David Lean and will do a comparative study. Furthermore, I will concentrate on highlighting the West’s fear of islamophobia and the consequences arising from it with due reference to the movie Khuda Ke Liye (2007), a Pakistani Urdu movie by Shoaib Mansoor.
拉迪亚德·吉卜林在他被多次引用的诗句中揭示了东方主义思想长期传统的核心。J.J.克拉克认为,西方对东方的矛盾心理由来已久。这种矛盾心理很大程度上源于两国共同的宗教和文化差异。宗教作为一种文化建构行为,以一种特定的形式和文化进行循环,可以说是性格的定义者。因此,每一种文化都有自己独特的价值观和信仰。为了进一步阐明这一概念,本文打算通过将赛义德对东方主义的研究应用于西方关于东方的霸权话语来检验这一思想,并试图强调这样一个事实,即东西方二分法是“选择性文化映射”的结果,是有意疏远东方的企图。为了揭示东西方的二分法,突出西方对东方的选择性文化映射,本文将分析e.m.福斯特的《印度之旅》(1924)及其由大卫·里恩改编的电影,并进行比较研究。此外,我将重点强调西方对伊斯兰恐惧症的恐惧以及由此产生的后果,并适当参考电影《Khuda Ke Liye》(2007),这是一部由Shoaib Mansoor执导的巴基斯坦乌尔都语电影。