Standardizing AI - The Case of the European Commission's Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act

Martin Ebers
{"title":"Standardizing AI - The Case of the European Commission's Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act","authors":"Martin Ebers","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3900378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On April 21, 2021, the European Commission presented its long-awaited proposal for a Regulation “laying down harmonized rules on Artificial Intelligence”, the so-called “Artificial Intelligence Act” (hereinafter: AIA). Most of the provisions of the AIA deal with high-risk systems, setting out obligations on providers, users and other participants across the AI value chain, establishing in particular, conformity assessment procedures to be followed for each type of high-risk AI system. At the heart of the proposal is the idea of co-regulation through standardization based on the New Legislative Framework (NLF). According to Recital (61) AIA, “[s]tandardization should play a key role to provide technical solutions to providers to ensure compliance with this Regulation”. Accordingly, this chapter provides a critical analysis of the proposal, discussing in particular, how the envisaged system of co-regulation, standardization and certification could contribute to European governance of AI and address the manifold ethical and legal concerns of (high-risk) AI systems.","PeriodicalId":152939,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning eJournal","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3900378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

On April 21, 2021, the European Commission presented its long-awaited proposal for a Regulation “laying down harmonized rules on Artificial Intelligence”, the so-called “Artificial Intelligence Act” (hereinafter: AIA). Most of the provisions of the AIA deal with high-risk systems, setting out obligations on providers, users and other participants across the AI value chain, establishing in particular, conformity assessment procedures to be followed for each type of high-risk AI system. At the heart of the proposal is the idea of co-regulation through standardization based on the New Legislative Framework (NLF). According to Recital (61) AIA, “[s]tandardization should play a key role to provide technical solutions to providers to ensure compliance with this Regulation”. Accordingly, this chapter provides a critical analysis of the proposal, discussing in particular, how the envisaged system of co-regulation, standardization and certification could contribute to European governance of AI and address the manifold ethical and legal concerns of (high-risk) AI systems.
标准化人工智能——以欧盟委员会提出的人工智能法案为例
2021年4月21日,欧盟委员会提交了期待已久的“制定人工智能协调规则”的法规提案,即所谓的“人工智能法案”(以下简称“AIA”)。友邦保险的大部分条款涉及高风险系统,规定了人工智能价值链上供应商、用户和其他参与者的义务,特别是为每种类型的高风险人工智能系统建立了应遵循的合格评定程序。该提案的核心是通过基于新立法框架(NLF)的标准化进行共同监管的想法。根据AIA的Recital(61),“标准化应该发挥关键作用,为供应商提供技术解决方案,以确保遵守本法规”。因此,本章对该提案进行了批判性分析,特别讨论了设想的共同监管、标准化和认证系统如何有助于欧洲对人工智能的治理,并解决(高风险)人工智能系统的多种道德和法律问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信