FAIRNESS AS A PRIVATE LAW PRINCIPLE AND ITS EFFECTIVENESS CRITERION

B. Gongalo, N. Novikova
{"title":"FAIRNESS AS A PRIVATE LAW PRINCIPLE AND ITS EFFECTIVENESS CRITERION","authors":"B. Gongalo, N. Novikova","doi":"10.34076/2619-0672-2018-2-79-90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: the history of legal regulation is connected with the problem of fairness of legal norms (this question was raised in the politico-legal concepts of antiquity, the Middle Ages, New Era and contemporary times). Nowadays, in the context of legislative reforms and search for a balance between private and public interests, the question of fairness has not lost its significance. Not only legal theorists face this question, but legislator comes across it when determining the direction of the legislative deve-\nlopment. The same question arises when law enforcer has to solve certain legal dispute. The main goal of this research is to determine the value of fairness in the private-law regulation of social relations.\n\nMethods: the systematic analysis of the «fairness» category in the aspect of its impact on the modern state of private-law regulation acts as a determining method of the research. This particular method was chosen because it allows revealing the integrity and complex nature of the category under study. Apart from the systematic analysis, during the research general scientific dialectical method of cognition and special methods of investigation (formally legal, comparative law research, method of legal modeling) were also used.\n\nAnalysis: in the framework of study the main tendencies of private law development in the modern economic and political conditions from the perspective of general legal and private-law approaches have been investigated, inter alia the issue of searching the balance in private and public, personal and common interests in various scopes of private law application.\n\nResults: the authors come to the conclusion that the category of fairness is multidimensional. On the one hand, it can serve as a private law principle that stems from the extensive principle of law fairness, and, on the other hand, being the reflection of social compromise, should serve as a criterion of the effectiveness of the private-law regulations on the national and international level.","PeriodicalId":215513,"journal":{"name":"Herald of the Euro-Asian Law Congress","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of the Euro-Asian Law Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34076/2619-0672-2018-2-79-90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: the history of legal regulation is connected with the problem of fairness of legal norms (this question was raised in the politico-legal concepts of antiquity, the Middle Ages, New Era and contemporary times). Nowadays, in the context of legislative reforms and search for a balance between private and public interests, the question of fairness has not lost its significance. Not only legal theorists face this question, but legislator comes across it when determining the direction of the legislative deve- lopment. The same question arises when law enforcer has to solve certain legal dispute. The main goal of this research is to determine the value of fairness in the private-law regulation of social relations. Methods: the systematic analysis of the «fairness» category in the aspect of its impact on the modern state of private-law regulation acts as a determining method of the research. This particular method was chosen because it allows revealing the integrity and complex nature of the category under study. Apart from the systematic analysis, during the research general scientific dialectical method of cognition and special methods of investigation (formally legal, comparative law research, method of legal modeling) were also used. Analysis: in the framework of study the main tendencies of private law development in the modern economic and political conditions from the perspective of general legal and private-law approaches have been investigated, inter alia the issue of searching the balance in private and public, personal and common interests in various scopes of private law application. Results: the authors come to the conclusion that the category of fairness is multidimensional. On the one hand, it can serve as a private law principle that stems from the extensive principle of law fairness, and, on the other hand, being the reflection of social compromise, should serve as a criterion of the effectiveness of the private-law regulations on the national and international level.
公平作为私法原则及其效力标准
导言:法律规制的历史与法律规范的公平问题有关(这个问题在古代、中世纪、新时代和当代的政法概念中被提出)。如今,在立法改革和寻求公私利益平衡的背景下,公平问题并没有失去其重要性。这不仅是法学家面临的问题,也是立法者在确定立法发展方向时遇到的问题。当执法者必须解决某些法律纠纷时,也会出现同样的问题。本研究的主要目的是确定公平在社会关系的私法规制中的价值。方法:系统分析“公平”范畴对现代私法规制的影响,作为确定研究方法。之所以选择这种特殊的方法,是因为它可以揭示所研究类别的完整性和复杂性。在研究过程中,除了系统分析外,还运用了一般的科学辩证的认识方法和特殊的调查方法(形式法学、比较法研究、法律建模方法)。分析:在研究的框架下,从一般法和私法的角度考察了现代经济和政治条件下私法发展的主要趋势,特别是在各种私法适用范围内寻求私法与公法、个人利益与共同利益的平衡问题。结果:得出公平范畴是多维的结论。它一方面可以作为源于广泛的法律公平原则的私法原则,另一方面,作为社会妥协的体现,应该作为衡量私法规制在国家和国际层面有效性的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信