PRODUCTION OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS IN THE SVERDLOVSK REGION IN THE «GLORIOUS DECADE»: REFORM TESTING

V. Mamyachenkov, V. Motrevich
{"title":"PRODUCTION OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS IN THE SVERDLOVSK REGION IN THE «GLORIOUS DECADE»: REFORM TESTING","authors":"V. Mamyachenkov, V. Motrevich","doi":"10.33693/2658-4654-2023-5-1-54-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the research is due to the great interest shown by the Russian society to the historical period studied in the article. The purpose of writing the work was to study the dynamics of gross production of the main types of livestock products (meat, milk and wool) by all categories of farms in the Sverdlovsk region during one of the most interesting and problematic periods in the history of the Soviet state. The novelty of the research is determined by the use of materials from three archives: the Russian State Archive of Economics (RGAE), the Center for Documentation of Public Organizations of the Sverdlovsk Region (TSDOOSO) and the Current archive of the Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Sverdlovsk Region (TOFSGSSO). It is emphasized that in the history of the USSR it is difficult to find such a contradictory historical period as the rule of N.S. Khrushchev. It is argued that the reforms implemented in the agricultural sector in the 1950s were insufficiently thought out and inconsistent. The authors state that N.S. Khrushchev sincerely wanted to provide food to the Soviet people, but could not find the right way for this. Attention is focused on the fact that the essence of N.S. Khrushchev's agrarian policy was the completion of the process of «defarming» and the transformation of the peasant-collective farmer into a «worker with a vegetable garden». It is proved that a number of negative phenomena, the initiation of which is reproached by the First Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee, have not been slowed down by his successors. It is concluded that it is N.S. Khrushchev became the last sincere reformer of agriculture and the economy of the Soviet Union as a whole on the basis of fully socialized property.","PeriodicalId":312743,"journal":{"name":"History and modern perspectives","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and modern perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33693/2658-4654-2023-5-1-54-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the research is due to the great interest shown by the Russian society to the historical period studied in the article. The purpose of writing the work was to study the dynamics of gross production of the main types of livestock products (meat, milk and wool) by all categories of farms in the Sverdlovsk region during one of the most interesting and problematic periods in the history of the Soviet state. The novelty of the research is determined by the use of materials from three archives: the Russian State Archive of Economics (RGAE), the Center for Documentation of Public Organizations of the Sverdlovsk Region (TSDOOSO) and the Current archive of the Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service for the Sverdlovsk Region (TOFSGSSO). It is emphasized that in the history of the USSR it is difficult to find such a contradictory historical period as the rule of N.S. Khrushchev. It is argued that the reforms implemented in the agricultural sector in the 1950s were insufficiently thought out and inconsistent. The authors state that N.S. Khrushchev sincerely wanted to provide food to the Soviet people, but could not find the right way for this. Attention is focused on the fact that the essence of N.S. Khrushchev's agrarian policy was the completion of the process of «defarming» and the transformation of the peasant-collective farmer into a «worker with a vegetable garden». It is proved that a number of negative phenomena, the initiation of which is reproached by the First Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee, have not been slowed down by his successors. It is concluded that it is N.S. Khrushchev became the last sincere reformer of agriculture and the economy of the Soviet Union as a whole on the basis of fully socialized property.
斯维尔德洛夫斯克地区畜牧产品生产“光荣的十年”:改革试验
研究的相关性是由于俄罗斯社会对文章所研究的历史时期表现出极大的兴趣。写这本书的目的是研究在苏维埃国家历史上最有趣和最有问题的时期之一,斯维尔德洛夫斯克地区所有类型的农场的主要牲畜产品(肉、奶和羊毛)的生产动态。这项研究的新颖性是由三个档案馆的材料决定的:俄罗斯国家经济档案馆(RGAE),斯维尔德洛夫斯克州公共组织文件中心(TSDOOSO)和斯维尔德洛夫斯克州联邦国家统计局领土机构(TOFSGSSO)的现有档案。强调在苏联历史上很难找到像赫鲁晓夫统治时期这样矛盾的历史时期。有人认为,20世纪50年代在农业部门实施的改革考虑不足,前后矛盾。作者指出,N.S.赫鲁晓夫真诚地想为苏联人民提供食物,但却找不到正确的方法。人们的注意力集中在这样一个事实上,即N.S.赫鲁晓夫的土地政策的本质是完成“解除武装”的过程,并将农民集体农场主转变为“拥有菜园的工人”。事实证明,一些被苏共中央第一书记谴责为其始作俑者的消极现象,并没有被他的后继者所减缓。结论是,正是N.S.赫鲁晓夫在财产完全社会化的基础上,成为苏联农业和整个经济的最后一个真诚的改革家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信