Organizational transformation in crisis: learning from emergent patterns of knowing and organizing

Virginia Andres, Dongcheol Heo
{"title":"Organizational transformation in crisis: learning from emergent patterns of knowing and organizing","authors":"Virginia Andres, Dongcheol Heo","doi":"10.1108/tlo-09-2022-0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nComplex crises affect tightly coupled systems making them highly unpredictable. This paper aims to determine how organizations learn from their crisis experience shaping their knowledge and transformation trajectory toward and beyond survival. A theoretical framework integrating organizational learning (OL) and knowledge management in organizational transformation (OT) in complex crises is presented.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis conceptual paper presents a systematic literature review on OT in crisis from 2000 to 2021. To achieve integration, the authors searched for studies on OT, knowledge management and OL, each paired with a crisis.\n\n\nFindings\nCrises highlight the emergent and decentered nature of knowing and organizing. This study suggests that OT is achieved through various changes in organizational knowledge. Different learning modes enable the transformation of knowledge in a crisis: contextual or situated learning, strategic and collective integration.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe authors' pandemic experience may have influenced the analysis. This paper does not account for new types of learning emerging due to the influence of digital technologies.\n\n\nPractical implications\nOrganizations may hasten renewal through distributed crisis management facilitated by contextual and strategic learning and collective integration.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study categorizes learning, based on its function in crisis management, into three types: contextual learning for creative problem-solving, strategic learning for leadership and direction and collective integration to evaluate their crisis journey. Through this classification, this study sheds light on the types of knowledge needed to manage crises effectively, showing that organizations can leverage their crises by transforming and innovating themselves in this turbulent period.\n","PeriodicalId":365387,"journal":{"name":"The Learning Organization","volume":"2 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Learning Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tlo-09-2022-0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose Complex crises affect tightly coupled systems making them highly unpredictable. This paper aims to determine how organizations learn from their crisis experience shaping their knowledge and transformation trajectory toward and beyond survival. A theoretical framework integrating organizational learning (OL) and knowledge management in organizational transformation (OT) in complex crises is presented. Design/methodology/approach This conceptual paper presents a systematic literature review on OT in crisis from 2000 to 2021. To achieve integration, the authors searched for studies on OT, knowledge management and OL, each paired with a crisis. Findings Crises highlight the emergent and decentered nature of knowing and organizing. This study suggests that OT is achieved through various changes in organizational knowledge. Different learning modes enable the transformation of knowledge in a crisis: contextual or situated learning, strategic and collective integration. Research limitations/implications The authors' pandemic experience may have influenced the analysis. This paper does not account for new types of learning emerging due to the influence of digital technologies. Practical implications Organizations may hasten renewal through distributed crisis management facilitated by contextual and strategic learning and collective integration. Originality/value This study categorizes learning, based on its function in crisis management, into three types: contextual learning for creative problem-solving, strategic learning for leadership and direction and collective integration to evaluate their crisis journey. Through this classification, this study sheds light on the types of knowledge needed to manage crises effectively, showing that organizations can leverage their crises by transforming and innovating themselves in this turbulent period.
危机中的组织转型:从紧急的认识和组织模式中学习
复杂的危机影响紧密耦合的系统,使它们高度不可预测。本文旨在确定组织如何从危机经验中学习,塑造他们的知识和转型轨迹,走向生存和超越生存。提出了复杂危机下组织转型中组织学习与知识管理相结合的理论框架。这篇概念性论文对2000年至2021年危机中的OT进行了系统的文献综述。为了实现整合,作者搜索了关于OT、知识管理和OL的研究,每个研究都与危机相关联。危机突出了认识和组织的突发性和分散性。本研究表明,OT是通过组织知识的各种变化来实现的。不同的学习模式能够在危机中实现知识的转化:情境或情境学习、战略和集体整合。研究局限性/意义作者的大流行经历可能影响了分析。本文没有考虑到由于数字技术的影响而出现的新型学习。实际意义组织可以通过情境和战略学习以及集体整合促进的分布式危机管理来加速更新。通过这种分类,本研究揭示了有效管理危机所需的知识类型,表明组织可以通过在这个动荡时期进行转型和创新来利用危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信