Comparative Study on Recent Development of Heuristic Optimization Methods

V. Sai, Chin-Shiuh Shieh, Yuh-Chung Lin, M. Horng, Trong-The Nguyen, Quang-Duy Le, Jung-Yi Jiang
{"title":"Comparative Study on Recent Development of Heuristic Optimization Methods","authors":"V. Sai, Chin-Shiuh Shieh, Yuh-Chung Lin, M. Horng, Trong-The Nguyen, Quang-Duy Le, Jung-Yi Jiang","doi":"10.1109/CMCSN.2016.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In engineering and design problems, various noisy non-linear mathematical optimization problems can't be efficaciously solved by using conventional optimization techniques. But metaheuristic algorithms seem very efficient to approach in these problems and became very popular such as Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Recently, many new metaheuristic algorithms were proposed, but the performance of these algorithms in solving noisy non-linear optimization problems when compared with popular methods still need more of verifications. In this context, two popular algorithms called GA and PSO will be compared with some recent metaheuristic algorithms such as Grey Wolf Optimizer, Firefly Algorithm, and Brain Storm Optimization algorithm in finding optimal solutions of noisy non-linear optimization problems. The results will be compared in terms of accuracy of the best solutions found and the execution time.","PeriodicalId":153377,"journal":{"name":"2016 Third International Conference on Computing Measurement Control and Sensor Network (CMCSN)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Third International Conference on Computing Measurement Control and Sensor Network (CMCSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMCSN.2016.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In engineering and design problems, various noisy non-linear mathematical optimization problems can't be efficaciously solved by using conventional optimization techniques. But metaheuristic algorithms seem very efficient to approach in these problems and became very popular such as Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Recently, many new metaheuristic algorithms were proposed, but the performance of these algorithms in solving noisy non-linear optimization problems when compared with popular methods still need more of verifications. In this context, two popular algorithms called GA and PSO will be compared with some recent metaheuristic algorithms such as Grey Wolf Optimizer, Firefly Algorithm, and Brain Storm Optimization algorithm in finding optimal solutions of noisy non-linear optimization problems. The results will be compared in terms of accuracy of the best solutions found and the execution time.
启发式优化方法最新发展的比较研究
在工程设计问题中,传统的优化技术无法有效地解决各种有噪声的非线性数学优化问题。而元启发式算法在解决这类问题上显得非常有效,并得到了广泛的应用,如遗传算法(GA)、粒子群算法(PSO)等。近年来,人们提出了许多新的元启发式算法,但与常用方法相比,这些算法在解决有噪声非线性优化问题方面的性能还有待进一步验证。在此背景下,两种流行的算法GA和PSO将与一些最近的元启发式算法如灰狼优化器、萤火虫算法和头脑风暴优化算法在寻找噪声非线性优化问题的最优解方面进行比较。将根据找到的最佳解决方案的准确性和执行时间对结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信