Establishing difficulty level consistency across texts in exams at four levels using lexical profiling

D. Waller, Tania Horák
{"title":"Establishing difficulty level consistency across texts in exams at four levels using lexical profiling","authors":"D. Waller, Tania Horák","doi":"10.60149/lpge3138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research looked at investigating the consistency of difficulty across the four levels of exams (B1, B2, C1, C2 as per the CEFR) which have been developed by the exams team at the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan). This was completed using two measures of difficulty: readability and word frequency i.e. the research undertook lexical profiling. Results were compared to similar results from Cambridge ESOL exams (Khalifa and Weir 2007) at the equivalent CEFR levels. In addition, this research project aimed to create a database to use as the basis for future benchmarking to improve future exam production. In this initial stage of the project, only the Reading sections of the exams were analysed. Practical implications for exam development conclude the article.","PeriodicalId":301329,"journal":{"name":"CALR Linguistics Journal - Issue 7","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CALR Linguistics Journal - Issue 7","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60149/lpge3138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research looked at investigating the consistency of difficulty across the four levels of exams (B1, B2, C1, C2 as per the CEFR) which have been developed by the exams team at the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan). This was completed using two measures of difficulty: readability and word frequency i.e. the research undertook lexical profiling. Results were compared to similar results from Cambridge ESOL exams (Khalifa and Weir 2007) at the equivalent CEFR levels. In addition, this research project aimed to create a database to use as the basis for future benchmarking to improve future exam production. In this initial stage of the project, only the Reading sections of the exams were analysed. Practical implications for exam development conclude the article.
使用词汇分析方法在四个等级的考试中建立文本难度的一致性
这项研究着眼于调查四个等级考试难度的一致性(根据CEFR, B1, B2, C1, C2),这是由中央兰开夏大学(UCLan)的考试团队开发的。这是通过两种难度测量来完成的:可读性和词频,即研究进行了词汇分析。将结果与同等CEFR水平的剑桥ESOL考试(Khalifa and Weir 2007)的类似结果进行比较。此外,该研究项目旨在创建一个数据库,作为未来基准测试的基础,以提高未来的考试质量。在这个项目的初始阶段,只分析了考试的阅读部分。考试开发的实际意义是本文的最后一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信