Introduction:The Mediation of Failed Mediation

Amit Pinchevski
{"title":"Introduction:The Mediation of Failed Mediation","authors":"Amit Pinchevski","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190625580.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1995 Binjamin Wilkomirski published a book that was to become a source of fierce controversy. Fragments: Memories of a Wartime Childhood recounts Wilkomirski’s experiences of surviving alone two concentration camps as a small Jewish child from Poland. Having lived most of his life as Bruno Dössekker, the adopted son of a Swiss couple, Wilkomirski claimed to have discovered his true identity through a long psychoanalytic process, which led to writing his story. The book quickly received popular and critical acclaim and won a number of literary prizes, including the National Jewish Book Award. What happened next is fairly well known: a 1998 newspaper article cast doubt as to the authenticity of Wilkomirski’s account, revealing instead the story of a Bruno Grosjean, the illegitimate son of an unmarried woman who had given him away for adoption in Switzerland. The book’s publisher then commissioned a historian to look into the allegations, which were consequently found to be correct. The book previously described as “achingly beautiful” and “morally important” was now declared as fake and its author a fraud. The Wilkomirski case has since figured in debates on Holocaust memory as a cautionary tale about the facility with which one can pass as a survivor— and convince a worldwide audience. The book was discontinued as memoir only later to be released in tandem with the historical study finding it false. While Wilkomirski’s memories may have been fabricated, the way they were depicted in the book is a fairly accurate description of traumatic memory. Even if the content of these memories is made- up their structure very much conforms to a psychology textbook entry on post- trauma. Evidently Wilkomirski was aware of this fact, as in the afterword to the book, he urges others in a similar situation to “cry out their own traumatic childhood memories.”","PeriodicalId":168461,"journal":{"name":"Transmitted Wounds","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transmitted Wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190625580.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1995 Binjamin Wilkomirski published a book that was to become a source of fierce controversy. Fragments: Memories of a Wartime Childhood recounts Wilkomirski’s experiences of surviving alone two concentration camps as a small Jewish child from Poland. Having lived most of his life as Bruno Dössekker, the adopted son of a Swiss couple, Wilkomirski claimed to have discovered his true identity through a long psychoanalytic process, which led to writing his story. The book quickly received popular and critical acclaim and won a number of literary prizes, including the National Jewish Book Award. What happened next is fairly well known: a 1998 newspaper article cast doubt as to the authenticity of Wilkomirski’s account, revealing instead the story of a Bruno Grosjean, the illegitimate son of an unmarried woman who had given him away for adoption in Switzerland. The book’s publisher then commissioned a historian to look into the allegations, which were consequently found to be correct. The book previously described as “achingly beautiful” and “morally important” was now declared as fake and its author a fraud. The Wilkomirski case has since figured in debates on Holocaust memory as a cautionary tale about the facility with which one can pass as a survivor— and convince a worldwide audience. The book was discontinued as memoir only later to be released in tandem with the historical study finding it false. While Wilkomirski’s memories may have been fabricated, the way they were depicted in the book is a fairly accurate description of traumatic memory. Even if the content of these memories is made- up their structure very much conforms to a psychology textbook entry on post- trauma. Evidently Wilkomirski was aware of this fact, as in the afterword to the book, he urges others in a similar situation to “cry out their own traumatic childhood memories.”
简介:调解失败的调解
1995年,本杰明·威尔科米斯基出版了一本书,这本书后来引发了激烈的争议。《碎片:战时童年的回忆》讲述了威尔科米斯基作为一个来自波兰的小犹太孩子独自在两个集中营中幸存下来的经历。威尔科米斯基一生中大部分时间都以布鲁诺Dössekker的名字度过,他是一对瑞士夫妇的养子。他声称,通过长期的精神分析过程,他发现了自己的真实身份,并因此写下了他的故事。这本书迅速受到大众和评论界的好评,并赢得了许多文学奖项,包括国家犹太图书奖。接下来发生的事情是众所周知的:1998年报纸上的一篇文章对威尔科米斯基的描述的真实性提出了质疑,而是揭露了布鲁诺·格罗斯让的故事,他是一位未婚女子的私生子,被送去瑞士收养。这本书的出版商随后委托一位历史学家调查这些指控,结果发现这些指控是正确的。这本书之前被描述为“令人心痛的美丽”和“道德上的重要”,现在被宣布为假的,它的作者是一个骗子。从那以后,威尔科米斯基案就成为大屠杀记忆辩论中的一个警世故事,告诉人们,一个人可以作为幸存者通过这种设施——并说服全世界的观众。这本书作为回忆录被停刊了,后来在历史研究发现它是假的情况下才被出版。虽然威尔科米斯基的记忆可能是虚构的,但书中对这些记忆的描述是对创伤记忆的相当准确的描述。即使这些记忆的内容是编造出来的,它们的结构也非常符合心理学教科书上关于创伤后的条目。显然,威尔科米斯基意识到了这一事实,在书的后记中,他敦促其他人在类似的情况下“大声说出自己创伤的童年记忆”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信