In vitro evaluation of enamel and cementum abrasion after toothbrushing.

J Rajstein, J Lustmann, J Hershkovitz, I Gedalia
{"title":"In vitro evaluation of enamel and cementum abrasion after toothbrushing.","authors":"J Rajstein,&nbsp;J Lustmann,&nbsp;J Hershkovitz,&nbsp;I Gedalia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abrasion in human teeth brushed with toothbrush and dentifrice was evaluated quantitatively by SEM. Specimens which included surface enamel and cementum were cut from unerupted wisdom teeth. Controlled brushing was carried out by a brushing machine, with dentifrice or saline, for periods of five and ten minutes. Scratches were counted using SE micrographs. No scratches were observed on the enamel surfaces, due probably to its hardness. The cementum surfaces revealed scratches, the number increasing with the duration of burshing. Brushing with saline was much less abrasive than with dentifrice. It was concluded that damage to the cementum is caused primarily by the dentifrice, brushing per se being a minor factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":76412,"journal":{"name":"Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (Tel Aviv, Israel : 1969)","volume":"28 1","pages":"17-20, 15-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (Tel Aviv, Israel : 1969)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abrasion in human teeth brushed with toothbrush and dentifrice was evaluated quantitatively by SEM. Specimens which included surface enamel and cementum were cut from unerupted wisdom teeth. Controlled brushing was carried out by a brushing machine, with dentifrice or saline, for periods of five and ten minutes. Scratches were counted using SE micrographs. No scratches were observed on the enamel surfaces, due probably to its hardness. The cementum surfaces revealed scratches, the number increasing with the duration of burshing. Brushing with saline was much less abrasive than with dentifrice. It was concluded that damage to the cementum is caused primarily by the dentifrice, brushing per se being a minor factor.

刷牙后牙釉质和牙骨质磨损的体外评价。
用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)定量评价了牙刷和牙膏对人类牙齿的磨损情况。标本包括表面牙釉质和牙骨质从未爆发的智齿切割。受控的刷牙是用牙刷进行的,用牙膏或生理盐水,时间为5分钟和10分钟。使用SE显微照片对划痕进行计数。珐琅表面未见划痕,可能是由于它的硬度。牙骨质表面出现划痕,划痕数量随着刷刷时间的延长而增加。用生理盐水刷牙的磨蚀性比用牙膏要小得多。结论是牙骨质的损伤主要是由牙膏引起的,刷牙本身是一个次要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信