Wille und Erkenntnis: Synthese, Dualismus oder Aporie? Ein konzeptionelles Grundproblem der Philosophie Schopenhauers

Alessandro Novembre
{"title":"Wille und Erkenntnis: Synthese, Dualismus oder Aporie? Ein konzeptionelles Grundproblem der Philosophie Schopenhauers","authors":"Alessandro Novembre","doi":"10.5902/2179378667477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between will and cognition represents one of the most fundamental issues in Schopenhauer’s philosophy. The possibility of aesthetic experience, which involves a deliverance of cognition from the service of the will, and even more so the doctrine of the redemption through cognition – the fact that cognition can become a “tranquillizer” of the will and bring will to abolish itself – seems incompatible with Schopenhauer’s voluntaristic metaphysics (i.e., with the principle of the “primacy of the will”). This paper aims to analyse this controversial part of Schopenhauer’s discourse, especially in its implications for the system’s logical consistency, and tries to provide a theoretical and genetic explanation of the question.","PeriodicalId":111706,"journal":{"name":"Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voluntas: Revista Internacional de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378667477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between will and cognition represents one of the most fundamental issues in Schopenhauer’s philosophy. The possibility of aesthetic experience, which involves a deliverance of cognition from the service of the will, and even more so the doctrine of the redemption through cognition – the fact that cognition can become a “tranquillizer” of the will and bring will to abolish itself – seems incompatible with Schopenhauer’s voluntaristic metaphysics (i.e., with the principle of the “primacy of the will”). This paper aims to analyse this controversial part of Schopenhauer’s discourse, especially in its implications for the system’s logical consistency, and tries to provide a theoretical and genetic explanation of the question.
意志与知识,合成,双分论,还是ap理论?哲学理念的基本问题
意志与认知的关系是叔本华哲学中最基本的问题之一。审美经验的可能性,包括将认知从意志的服务中解放出来,甚至是通过认知进行救赎的学说——认知可以成为意志的“镇静剂”,并使意志自我废除——似乎与叔本华的唯意志论形而上学(即,与“意志至上”的原则)不相容。本文旨在分析叔本华话语中这一有争议的部分,特别是其对系统逻辑一致性的含义,并试图对这一问题提供理论和遗传学的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信