Selective partial access to a database

ACM '76 Pub Date : 1976-10-20 DOI:10.1145/800191.805537
R. Conway, D. Strip
{"title":"Selective partial access to a database","authors":"R. Conway, D. Strip","doi":"10.1145/800191.805537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A system to support a multi-function, shared-access database requires the capability of defining for each user an arbitrary subset of the fields of a logical record to which access is allowed. The feasibility of such a capability has already been demonstrated by several operational systems. This paper is concerned with the possibility of granting something less than complete access to a specified field of a record. The purpose would be to allow a user to perform various summary and statistical tasks over controlled fields without allowing identification of the exact value of a field in a particular record.\n Three different strategies are examined: 1. An arbitrary partition of values is defined for each restricted field. A user granted this type of access can determine only which class of the partition contains the field value. 2. The actual field value is distorted by a random perturbation. 3. Access to actual field values is allowed—but values are dissociated from the actual record in which they occur.\n The third strategy—dissociation—appears to be the most interesting, potentially useful, but potentially vulnerable. In each case, the utility of incomplete access is examined and various implementation alternatives are explored. The degree of protection against persistent assault is determined.","PeriodicalId":379505,"journal":{"name":"ACM '76","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM '76","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800191.805537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

A system to support a multi-function, shared-access database requires the capability of defining for each user an arbitrary subset of the fields of a logical record to which access is allowed. The feasibility of such a capability has already been demonstrated by several operational systems. This paper is concerned with the possibility of granting something less than complete access to a specified field of a record. The purpose would be to allow a user to perform various summary and statistical tasks over controlled fields without allowing identification of the exact value of a field in a particular record. Three different strategies are examined: 1. An arbitrary partition of values is defined for each restricted field. A user granted this type of access can determine only which class of the partition contains the field value. 2. The actual field value is distorted by a random perturbation. 3. Access to actual field values is allowed—but values are dissociated from the actual record in which they occur. The third strategy—dissociation—appears to be the most interesting, potentially useful, but potentially vulnerable. In each case, the utility of incomplete access is examined and various implementation alternatives are explored. The degree of protection against persistent assault is determined.
对数据库的选择性部分访问
支持多功能共享访问数据库的系统需要能够为每个用户定义允许访问的逻辑记录字段的任意子集。这种能力的可行性已经由几个作战系统证明。本文关注的是对记录的指定字段授予非完全访问权限的可能性。其目的是允许用户在受控字段上执行各种汇总和统计任务,而不允许识别特定记录中字段的确切值。本文研究了三种不同的策略:为每个受限字段定义一个值的任意分区。被授予这种访问权限的用户只能确定分区的哪个类包含该字段值。2. 实际的场值被随机扰动所扭曲。3.允许访问实际字段值,但是这些值与它们所在的实际记录是分离的。第三种策略——分离——似乎是最有趣的,可能有用,但也可能脆弱。在每种情况下,都将检查不完全访问的效用,并探索各种实现替代方案。对持续攻击的保护程度是确定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信