Validation and uncertainty in model-based design space exploration: an experience report

Yon Vanommeslaeghe, D. Ceulemans, Bert Van Acker, J. Denil, S. Derammelaere, P. De Meulenaere
{"title":"Validation and uncertainty in model-based design space exploration: an experience report","authors":"Yon Vanommeslaeghe, D. Ceulemans, Bert Van Acker, J. Denil, S. Derammelaere, P. De Meulenaere","doi":"10.1145/3550356.3561581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model-based systems engineering (MBSE) techniques can help manage the growing complexity in the design and development of cyber-physical systems, and can even allow for the optimization of a system under design in simulation. However, models are always an abstraction of the real-world systems they represent. This introduces uncertainty at the model level, which affects the validity of simulation results, and thus also the results of the optimization. This, together with variations in real-world system parameters, significantly complicates the validation of simulation and optimization results. In this experience report, we first use a descriptive process model to describe our efforts to validate the results of a model-based design space exploration (DSE) process given this uncertainty. After this, we discuss lessons learned and insights gained, and identify future challenges. We present a possible prescriptive process model for future validation efforts, which specifically takes into account uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":182662,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings","volume":"202 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3550356.3561581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Model-based systems engineering (MBSE) techniques can help manage the growing complexity in the design and development of cyber-physical systems, and can even allow for the optimization of a system under design in simulation. However, models are always an abstraction of the real-world systems they represent. This introduces uncertainty at the model level, which affects the validity of simulation results, and thus also the results of the optimization. This, together with variations in real-world system parameters, significantly complicates the validation of simulation and optimization results. In this experience report, we first use a descriptive process model to describe our efforts to validate the results of a model-based design space exploration (DSE) process given this uncertainty. After this, we discuss lessons learned and insights gained, and identify future challenges. We present a possible prescriptive process model for future validation efforts, which specifically takes into account uncertainty.
基于模型的设计空间探索中的验证和不确定性:一份经验报告
基于模型的系统工程(MBSE)技术可以帮助管理网络物理系统设计和开发中日益增长的复杂性,甚至可以在仿真中对设计中的系统进行优化。然而,模型总是它们所代表的现实世界系统的抽象。这在模型层面引入了不确定性,影响了仿真结果的有效性,从而也影响了优化的结果。这一点,加上实际系统参数的变化,使仿真和优化结果的验证变得非常复杂。在这份经验报告中,我们首先使用描述性过程模型来描述我们的工作,以验证基于模型的设计空间探索(DSE)过程在这种不确定性下的结果。在此之后,我们讨论吸取的教训和获得的见解,并确定未来的挑战。我们为未来的验证工作提出了一个可能的规定性过程模型,它特别考虑了不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信