Using event calculus to formalise policy specification and analysis

A. Bandara, Emil C. Lupu, A. Russo
{"title":"Using event calculus to formalise policy specification and analysis","authors":"A. Bandara, Emil C. Lupu, A. Russo","doi":"10.1109/POLICY.2003.1206955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the interest in using policy-based approaches for systems management grows, it is becoming increasingly important to develop methods for performing analysis and refinement of policy specifications. Although this is an area that researchers have devoted some attention to, none of the proposed solutions address the issues of analysing specifications that combine authorisation and management policies; analysing policy specifications that contain constraints on the applicability of the policies; and performing a priori analysis of the specification that will both detect the presence of inconsistencies and explain the situations in which the conflict will occur. We present a method for transforming both policy and system behaviour specifications into a formal notation that is based on event calculus. Additionally it describes how this formalism can be used in conjunction with abductive reasoning techniques to perform a priori analysis of policy specifications for the various conflict types identified in the literature. Finally, it presents some initial thoughts on how this notation and analysis technique could be used to perform policy refinement.","PeriodicalId":391947,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings POLICY 2003. IEEE 4th International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"205","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings POLICY 2003. IEEE 4th International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/POLICY.2003.1206955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 205

Abstract

As the interest in using policy-based approaches for systems management grows, it is becoming increasingly important to develop methods for performing analysis and refinement of policy specifications. Although this is an area that researchers have devoted some attention to, none of the proposed solutions address the issues of analysing specifications that combine authorisation and management policies; analysing policy specifications that contain constraints on the applicability of the policies; and performing a priori analysis of the specification that will both detect the presence of inconsistencies and explain the situations in which the conflict will occur. We present a method for transforming both policy and system behaviour specifications into a formal notation that is based on event calculus. Additionally it describes how this formalism can be used in conjunction with abductive reasoning techniques to perform a priori analysis of policy specifications for the various conflict types identified in the literature. Finally, it presents some initial thoughts on how this notation and analysis technique could be used to perform policy refinement.
使用事件演算形式化策略规范和分析
随着对使用基于策略的方法进行系统管理的兴趣的增长,开发用于执行策略规范的分析和细化的方法变得越来越重要。尽管这是一个研究人员已经投入了一些注意力的领域,但没有一个提议的解决方案解决分析结合授权和管理政策的规范的问题;分析包含对策略适用性限制的策略规范;对规范进行先验分析,既可以检测不一致的存在,又可以解释冲突发生的情况。我们提出了一种将策略和系统行为规范转换为基于事件演算的形式化符号的方法。此外,它还描述了如何将这种形式主义与溯因推理技术结合使用,对文献中确定的各种冲突类型的政策规范进行先验分析。最后,本文提出了一些关于如何使用这种符号和分析技术来执行策略细化的初步想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信