Satisfaction of Pregnant Women when Checking Teeth at the Public Health Center

Ika Kusuma Wardani, Andi Istiqomah, Rindang Fitria Ulfa, Ambika Kurnia Mustikawati
{"title":"Satisfaction of Pregnant Women when Checking Teeth at the Public Health Center","authors":"Ika Kusuma Wardani, Andi Istiqomah, Rindang Fitria Ulfa, Ambika Kurnia Mustikawati","doi":"10.31935/delima.v9i1.157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Based on a preliminary study in the Tana Lili Public Health Center area, it was found that 11 pregnant (32.2%) had never had their teeth checked at the health center during pregnancy. Pregnant women do dental examinations at the health center or dentist if there are get toothache, cavities, bleeding gums, and others The aims of this study was to find out the description of pregnant satisfaction during dental check-ups at the health center towards the marketing mix. Methods: This research is a descriptive study with cross-sectional design. The sampling technique used purposive sampling by inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria in this study were pregnant women in the Tana Lili Public Health Center area who were willing to participate in this study. Exclusion criteria in this study were pregnant women who did not fill out the questionnaire completely. The number of samples in this study was 34 pregnant women. Results: Most of the pregnant women as many as 25 people (73.6%) were pregnant women who had a child. Most of the pregnant women were 17 people (50%) with high school education and the most occupations were housewives as many as 18 people (52.9%). Most pregnant women's husbands are self-employed as many as 15 people (44.1%). The highest family income is in the very high category, which is 13 people (38.2%). Pregnant women are satisfied with service products are 18 people (52.94%), price 23 people (67.65%), promotion 24 people (70.58%), people 22 (64.7%), process 23 people (67.65%), physical evidence 18 people (52.94%) and very satisfied with the place are 22 people (64.7%). Conclusion: Most pregnant women are satisfied with the product, price, promotion, people, process, physical evidence and are very satisfied with the places of the Tana Lili Public Health Center. Further research is needed with qualitative research to explore the reasons for pregnant women who are partially dissatisfied with promotion, people, and physical evidence so that public health center can improve their services.","PeriodicalId":260038,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Delima Harapan","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Delima Harapan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31935/delima.v9i1.157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Based on a preliminary study in the Tana Lili Public Health Center area, it was found that 11 pregnant (32.2%) had never had their teeth checked at the health center during pregnancy. Pregnant women do dental examinations at the health center or dentist if there are get toothache, cavities, bleeding gums, and others The aims of this study was to find out the description of pregnant satisfaction during dental check-ups at the health center towards the marketing mix. Methods: This research is a descriptive study with cross-sectional design. The sampling technique used purposive sampling by inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria in this study were pregnant women in the Tana Lili Public Health Center area who were willing to participate in this study. Exclusion criteria in this study were pregnant women who did not fill out the questionnaire completely. The number of samples in this study was 34 pregnant women. Results: Most of the pregnant women as many as 25 people (73.6%) were pregnant women who had a child. Most of the pregnant women were 17 people (50%) with high school education and the most occupations were housewives as many as 18 people (52.9%). Most pregnant women's husbands are self-employed as many as 15 people (44.1%). The highest family income is in the very high category, which is 13 people (38.2%). Pregnant women are satisfied with service products are 18 people (52.94%), price 23 people (67.65%), promotion 24 people (70.58%), people 22 (64.7%), process 23 people (67.65%), physical evidence 18 people (52.94%) and very satisfied with the place are 22 people (64.7%). Conclusion: Most pregnant women are satisfied with the product, price, promotion, people, process, physical evidence and are very satisfied with the places of the Tana Lili Public Health Center. Further research is needed with qualitative research to explore the reasons for pregnant women who are partially dissatisfied with promotion, people, and physical evidence so that public health center can improve their services.
孕妇在公共卫生中心检查牙齿时的满意度
背景:根据在塔纳丽丽公共卫生中心地区进行的初步研究,发现11名孕妇(32.2%)在怀孕期间从未在卫生中心检查过牙齿。孕妇如有牙痛、蛀牙、牙龈出血等情况,会到保健中心或牙医进行牙科检查。本研究的目的是找出孕妇在保健中心牙科检查时的满意度对市场组合的描述。方法:采用横断面设计的描述性研究。抽样技术采用纳入和排除标准的有目的抽样。本研究的纳入标准为愿意参加本研究的塔娜丽丽公共卫生中心地区的孕妇。本研究的排除标准是未完整填写问卷的孕妇。本研究的样本数量为34名孕妇。结果:以已育孕妇居多,达25人(73.6%)。高中以上学历的孕妇最多,为17人(50%),职业最多的是家庭主妇,达18人(52.9%)。大多数孕妇的丈夫是个体户,多达15人(44.1%)。收入最高的家庭是非常高的,有13人(38.2%)。孕妇对服务产品满意的有18人(52.94%),对价格满意的有23人(67.65%),对促销满意的有24人(70.58%),对人满意的有22人(64.7%),对流程满意的有23人(67.65%),对物证满意的有18人(52.94%),对地方非常满意的有22人(64.7%)。结论:大多数孕妇对塔娜丽丽公共卫生中心的产品、价格、促销、人员、流程、物证满意,对服务场所非常满意。进一步的研究需要通过定性研究来探讨孕妇对晋升、人员和物证部分不满意的原因,以便公共卫生中心改善其服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信