The Performance Gap of Policy Information Systems: A Knowledge Infrastructure Assessment Framework

E. Carrillo, Catalina Frigerio, María Jesús Valenzuela, Alessia Aquaro, J. Mauduit, I. Steenmans, María Paz Sandoval
{"title":"The Performance Gap of Policy Information Systems: A Knowledge Infrastructure Assessment Framework","authors":"E. Carrillo, Catalina Frigerio, María Jesús Valenzuela, Alessia Aquaro, J. Mauduit, I. Steenmans, María Paz Sandoval","doi":"10.38126/jspg220105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital technologies’ development and their ubiquity has significantly changed the way information is collected and shared. These changes are also observed in the ways that knowledge and information used to design and implement Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) policies are increasingly made accessible via digital platforms. Lacking, however, are evaluation frameworks to measure the performance and effectiveness of public information systems used for STI policy work. This limits what we know about what aspects work for whom, when, and why. As a response to this gap limiting our collective capacity for improving their utility, this paper presents an assessment framework tool for STI policy-focused digital knowledge platforms. Our proposition is informed by theoretical lessons from the areas of work on Knowledge Infrastructures (KIs) and Next Generation Repositories (NGRs), and practical experiences from policy professionals working in STI policy domains. The tool’s architecture is structured around three interdependent thematic pillars of performance in the production, aggregation, distribution, and maintenance of knowledge in digital information platforms: the communities pillar, the technical systems pillar, and the sustainability pillar. To test the design and utility of our proposed evaluation framework, we applied it on a digital platform of STI policy instruments maintained by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the Global Observatory for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (GO-SPIN) platform. We conclude with reflections on future areas for evaluation framework development.","PeriodicalId":222224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Policy & Governance","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Policy & Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg220105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital technologies’ development and their ubiquity has significantly changed the way information is collected and shared. These changes are also observed in the ways that knowledge and information used to design and implement Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) policies are increasingly made accessible via digital platforms. Lacking, however, are evaluation frameworks to measure the performance and effectiveness of public information systems used for STI policy work. This limits what we know about what aspects work for whom, when, and why. As a response to this gap limiting our collective capacity for improving their utility, this paper presents an assessment framework tool for STI policy-focused digital knowledge platforms. Our proposition is informed by theoretical lessons from the areas of work on Knowledge Infrastructures (KIs) and Next Generation Repositories (NGRs), and practical experiences from policy professionals working in STI policy domains. The tool’s architecture is structured around three interdependent thematic pillars of performance in the production, aggregation, distribution, and maintenance of knowledge in digital information platforms: the communities pillar, the technical systems pillar, and the sustainability pillar. To test the design and utility of our proposed evaluation framework, we applied it on a digital platform of STI policy instruments maintained by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the Global Observatory for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy (GO-SPIN) platform. We conclude with reflections on future areas for evaluation framework development.
政策信息系统的绩效差距:一个知识基础设施评估框架
数字技术的发展及其无处不在极大地改变了信息收集和共享的方式。这些变化还体现在用于设计和实施科学、技术和创新(STI)政策的知识和信息越来越多地通过数字平台获得。然而,缺乏评估框架来衡量用于科技创新政策工作的公共信息系统的绩效和有效性。这限制了我们对哪些方面对谁、何时以及为什么起作用的了解。作为对这一限制我们提高其效用的集体能力的差距的回应,本文提出了一个以科技创新政策为重点的数字知识平台的评估框架工具。我们的主张基于知识基础设施(KIs)和下一代知识库(NGRs)工作领域的理论教训,以及在科技创新政策领域工作的政策专业人员的实践经验。该工具的架构围绕数字信息平台中知识的生产、聚合、分发和维护方面的三个相互依存的主题支柱:社区支柱、技术系统支柱和可持续性支柱。为了测试我们提出的评估框架的设计和效用,我们将其应用于联合国教科文组织(UNESCO)维护的科技创新政策工具数字平台,即全球科学、技术和创新政策观察站(GO-SPIN)平台。最后,我们对评价框架发展的未来领域进行了思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信