Comparison of LoRaWAN classes and their power consumption

Phui San Cheong, J. Bergs, Chris Hawinkel, J. Famaey
{"title":"Comparison of LoRaWAN classes and their power consumption","authors":"Phui San Cheong, J. Bergs, Chris Hawinkel, J. Famaey","doi":"10.1109/SCVT.2017.8240313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many Internet of Things (IoT) applications benefit greatly from low-power long-range connectivity. A promising technology to achieve the low-power and long-range requirements is seen in LoRaWAN, a media access control (MAC) protocol maintained by the LoRa Alliance and leveraging Semtech's patented LoRa radio modulation technology. LoRaWAN provides three different device classes (A, B and C), which provide a tradeoff between performance (i.e., throughput and latency) and energy consumption. This paper offers a theoretical and experimental comparison of these classes. The objective of the quantitative experiment was twofold: to verify the published current levels of different operating modes in a LoRa chip's datasheet and to compare the battery lifetime for the LoRa class A and C modes of operation. We used a high-end current sensing circuit to gather the voltage levels and temporal variation with increasing payload sizes and spreading factors. Using the Ohmic Law, the energy drain can be calculated and compared across the different spreading factors (SF) and classes.","PeriodicalId":226008,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology (SCVT)","volume":"199 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology (SCVT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCVT.2017.8240313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

Many Internet of Things (IoT) applications benefit greatly from low-power long-range connectivity. A promising technology to achieve the low-power and long-range requirements is seen in LoRaWAN, a media access control (MAC) protocol maintained by the LoRa Alliance and leveraging Semtech's patented LoRa radio modulation technology. LoRaWAN provides three different device classes (A, B and C), which provide a tradeoff between performance (i.e., throughput and latency) and energy consumption. This paper offers a theoretical and experimental comparison of these classes. The objective of the quantitative experiment was twofold: to verify the published current levels of different operating modes in a LoRa chip's datasheet and to compare the battery lifetime for the LoRa class A and C modes of operation. We used a high-end current sensing circuit to gather the voltage levels and temporal variation with increasing payload sizes and spreading factors. Using the Ohmic Law, the energy drain can be calculated and compared across the different spreading factors (SF) and classes.
LoRaWAN类及其功耗的比较
许多物联网(IoT)应用从低功耗远程连接中受益匪浅。LoRaWAN是LoRa联盟维护的一种媒体访问控制(MAC)协议,利用Semtech的LoRa无线电调制专利技术,有望实现低功耗和远程要求。LoRaWAN提供三种不同的设备类别(A、B和C),在性能(即吞吐量和延迟)和能耗之间进行权衡。本文对这些类进行了理论和实验比较。定量实验的目的有两个:验证LoRa芯片数据表中公布的不同工作模式的电流水平,并比较LoRa a类和C类工作模式的电池寿命。我们使用高端电流传感电路来收集电压水平和随负载大小和扩展因子增加的时间变化。利用欧姆定律,可以计算和比较不同扩展因子(SF)和类别的能量损耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信