Implementation of Smart Contracts Using Hybrid Architectures with On and Off–Blockchain Components

Carlos Molina-Jiménez, Ioannis Sfyrakis, E. Solaiman, Irene Ng, M. Wong, A. Chun, J. Crowcroft
{"title":"Implementation of Smart Contracts Using Hybrid Architectures with On and Off–Blockchain Components","authors":"Carlos Molina-Jiménez, Ioannis Sfyrakis, E. Solaiman, Irene Ng, M. Wong, A. Chun, J. Crowcroft","doi":"10.1109/SC2.2018.00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decentralised (on-blockchain) and centralised (off–blockchain) platforms are available for the implementation of smart contracts. However, none of the two alternatives can individually provide the services and quality of services (QoS) imposed on smart contracts involved in a large class of applications. The reason is that blockchain platforms suffer from scalability, performance, transaction costs and other limitations. Likewise, off–blockchain platforms are afflicted by drawbacks emerging from their dependence on single trusted third parties. We argue that in several applications, hybrid platforms composed from the integration of on and off–blockchain platforms are more adequate. Developers that informatively choose between the three alternatives are likely to implement smart contracts that deliver the expected QoS. Hybrid architectures are largely unexplored. To help cover the gap and as a proof of concept, in this paper we discuss the implementation of smart contracts on hybrid architectures. We show how a smart contract can be split and executed partially on an off–blockchain contract compliance checker and partially on the rinkeby ethereum network. To test the solution, we expose it to sequences of contractual operations generated mechanically by a contract validator tool.","PeriodicalId":340244,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Cloud and Service Computing (SC2)","volume":"252 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Cloud and Service Computing (SC2)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SC2.2018.00018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Decentralised (on-blockchain) and centralised (off–blockchain) platforms are available for the implementation of smart contracts. However, none of the two alternatives can individually provide the services and quality of services (QoS) imposed on smart contracts involved in a large class of applications. The reason is that blockchain platforms suffer from scalability, performance, transaction costs and other limitations. Likewise, off–blockchain platforms are afflicted by drawbacks emerging from their dependence on single trusted third parties. We argue that in several applications, hybrid platforms composed from the integration of on and off–blockchain platforms are more adequate. Developers that informatively choose between the three alternatives are likely to implement smart contracts that deliver the expected QoS. Hybrid architectures are largely unexplored. To help cover the gap and as a proof of concept, in this paper we discuss the implementation of smart contracts on hybrid architectures. We show how a smart contract can be split and executed partially on an off–blockchain contract compliance checker and partially on the rinkeby ethereum network. To test the solution, we expose it to sequences of contractual operations generated mechanically by a contract validator tool.
使用带有区块链和非区块链组件的混合架构实现智能合约
分散式(区块链上)和集中式(区块链外)平台可用于实施智能合约。然而,这两种替代方案都不能单独提供服务和服务质量(QoS),这些服务和服务质量强加于涉及大量应用程序的智能合约。原因是区块链平台受到可扩展性、性能、交易成本等方面的限制。同样,非区块链平台也受到依赖单一可信第三方而出现的缺陷的困扰。我们认为,在一些应用程序中,由区块链上和区块链下平台集成组成的混合平台更合适。在这三种替代方案之间做出明智选择的开发人员可能会实现提供预期QoS的智能合约。混合架构在很大程度上尚未被探索。为了帮助弥补这一差距,并作为概念证明,我们在本文中讨论了混合架构上智能合约的实现。我们展示了智能合约如何在区块链外合约合规性检查器上部分分割和执行,部分在冰场以太坊网络上执行。为了测试解决方案,我们将其暴露于由契约验证器工具机械生成的契约操作序列中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信