How Should the Criminal Law Respond to the ‘Special Status’ of Children?

Heather Keating
{"title":"How Should the Criminal Law Respond to the ‘Special Status’ of Children?","authors":"Heather Keating","doi":"10.5040/9781509916801.ch-006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues the case for reform to three areas of the substantive criminal law: the age of criminal responsibility, fitness to plead as applied to children, and the creation of a defence of developmental immaturity. It is argued that these are three key areas where the law does not reflect appropriately the special status of children and their immaturity. In doing so, it takes a multi-disciplinary approach, drawing upon liberal theories of responsibility as well as, for example, findings from neuroscience and child development studies, international conventions and the law in other jurisdictions.","PeriodicalId":324483,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Law Reform Now","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Law Reform Now","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509916801.ch-006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter argues the case for reform to three areas of the substantive criminal law: the age of criminal responsibility, fitness to plead as applied to children, and the creation of a defence of developmental immaturity. It is argued that these are three key areas where the law does not reflect appropriately the special status of children and their immaturity. In doing so, it takes a multi-disciplinary approach, drawing upon liberal theories of responsibility as well as, for example, findings from neuroscience and child development studies, international conventions and the law in other jurisdictions.
刑法应如何回应儿童的“特殊地位”?
本章论述了对实体刑法的三个领域进行改革的理由:刑事责任的年龄,适用于儿童的辩护的适宜性,以及建立对发育不成熟的辩护。有人认为,这是法律没有适当反映儿童的特殊地位及其不成熟的三个关键领域。在此过程中,它采用了一种多学科的方法,借鉴了自由主义的责任理论,以及神经科学和儿童发展研究、国际公约和其他司法管辖区的法律等方面的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信