The Internal, Systemic and Constitutional Integrity of EU Regulation 883/2004 on the Coordination of Social Security Systems: Lessons from a Scandal

Tarjei Bekkedal
{"title":"The Internal, Systemic and Constitutional Integrity of EU Regulation 883/2004 on the Coordination of Social Security Systems: Lessons from a Scandal","authors":"Tarjei Bekkedal","doi":"10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2020-03-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Norwegian ‘social security’ scandal concerns the right to export sickness benefits pursuant to EU Regulation 883/2004. Norway is party to the EEA Agreement and the Regulation is binding in Norway. Norway’s Social Security Act requires continued presence in Norway to retain payable benefits. Thousands of claims have been rejected by disregarding Regulation 883/2004 or reading it down. Some hundred citizens have been sentenced to prison for welfare fraud because they stayed in another EU/EEA State and exported cash benefits in the absence of prior authorization. <br><br>Legal uncertainty seems to remain, and the exact scope of the scandal is still not clear. The paper discusses the reach and depth of the rights afforded by Regulation 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems. It argues that the main rules on equal treatment (Articles 4 and 5) and the main rule on free movement (Article 7) provide an unconditional right to export sickness benefits in cash. It provides an account of the internal, systemic, and constitutional integrity of the Regulation, and the equilibrium between coordination and harmonization. <br>","PeriodicalId":401648,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law: EU eJournal","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law: EU eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2020-03-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Norwegian ‘social security’ scandal concerns the right to export sickness benefits pursuant to EU Regulation 883/2004. Norway is party to the EEA Agreement and the Regulation is binding in Norway. Norway’s Social Security Act requires continued presence in Norway to retain payable benefits. Thousands of claims have been rejected by disregarding Regulation 883/2004 or reading it down. Some hundred citizens have been sentenced to prison for welfare fraud because they stayed in another EU/EEA State and exported cash benefits in the absence of prior authorization.

Legal uncertainty seems to remain, and the exact scope of the scandal is still not clear. The paper discusses the reach and depth of the rights afforded by Regulation 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems. It argues that the main rules on equal treatment (Articles 4 and 5) and the main rule on free movement (Article 7) provide an unconditional right to export sickness benefits in cash. It provides an account of the internal, systemic, and constitutional integrity of the Regulation, and the equilibrium between coordination and harmonization.
欧盟社会保障制度协调条例883/2004的内部、系统和宪法完整性:来自丑闻的教训
挪威的“社会保障”丑闻涉及根据欧盟第883/2004号条例出口疾病津贴的权利。挪威是欧洲经济区协议的缔约方,该条例在挪威具有约束力。挪威的《社会保障法》要求继续留在挪威以保留应付福利。由于无视第883/2004号条例或将其解读,成千上万的索赔被驳回。数百名公民因福利欺诈被判入狱,因为他们在没有事先授权的情况下留在另一个欧盟/欧洲经济区国家并出口现金福利。法律上的不确定性似乎依然存在,丑闻的确切范围仍不清楚。本文讨论了《883/2004号社会保障制度协调条例》所赋予权利的广度和深度。它认为,关于平等待遇的主要规则(第4和第5条)和关于自由流动的主要规则(第7条)规定了无条件出口现金疾病津贴的权利。它提供了一个内部的,系统的,和宪法完整性的规定,以及协调和协调之间的平衡的说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信