2544: Patient recruitment and referral patterns in face transplantation

H. Kiwanuka, M. Aycart, E. Bueno, M. Alhefzi, N. Krezdorn, B. Pomahac
{"title":"2544: Patient recruitment and referral patterns in face transplantation","authors":"H. Kiwanuka, M. Aycart, E. Bueno, M. Alhefzi, N. Krezdorn, B. Pomahac","doi":"10.1080/23723505.2016.1232968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2544: Patient recruitment and referral patterns in face transplantation Harriet Kiwanuka, Mario A. Aycart, MD, Ericka Bueno, Muayyad Alhefzi, Nicco Krezdorn, and Bohdan Pomahac Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Promising short term results raise an important question regarding its patient population—are centers that perform face transplantation effectively reaching individuals from the targeted facial disfigurement population? Our center reviewed our face transplantation contacts to assess patient recruitment and outreach performance. Methods We performed a retrospective review of subjects who requested screening for face transplantation (aka: “Contacts”) between the time of our IRB protocol approval (February 2008) to October 2015. We investigated the relationship between referral mode (physician vs self) with the Contact’s demographic characteristics (age, gender, race, mechanism of injury, geographic location) and clinical trial status. Results There were a total of 72 face transplantation Contacts The average age of the Contacts was 38 years, and the majority of them were male (n D 41, 569%) The predominant race of Contacts was White (n D 33) and the most prevalent mechanism of injury was burns (n D 32) The majority of our Contacts resided within the US (n D 47), with the majority from the Northeastern US (n D 21) Of the 72 Contacts, 35 (486%) were physician referrals and 37 (514%) were self referrals Physician referrals led to the most screened and transplanted Contacts in our center, whereas self-referral often led to immediate exclusion. Conclusions In this study, we show the diversity of patient characteristics and referral patterns in our clinical trial Furthermore, we describe the relationship of characteristics to outcomes in our cohort and identify areas of improvement, such as patient and physician education. Lastly, we are reminded of face transplantation’s potential impact. Figure 1. Overall clinical status of contacts -no (%). CONTACT Harriet Kiwanuka hkiwanuka@partners.org © 2016 Harriet Kiwanuka, Mario A. Aycart, Ericka Bueno, Muayyad Alhefzi, Nicco Krezdorn, and Bohdan Pomahac. Published with license by Taylor & Francis. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. VASCULARIZED COMPOSITE ALLOTRANSPLANTATION 2016, VOL. 3, NOS. 1–2, 30 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23723505.2016.1232968","PeriodicalId":372758,"journal":{"name":"Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23723505.2016.1232968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

2544: Patient recruitment and referral patterns in face transplantation Harriet Kiwanuka, Mario A. Aycart, MD, Ericka Bueno, Muayyad Alhefzi, Nicco Krezdorn, and Bohdan Pomahac Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Promising short term results raise an important question regarding its patient population—are centers that perform face transplantation effectively reaching individuals from the targeted facial disfigurement population? Our center reviewed our face transplantation contacts to assess patient recruitment and outreach performance. Methods We performed a retrospective review of subjects who requested screening for face transplantation (aka: “Contacts”) between the time of our IRB protocol approval (February 2008) to October 2015. We investigated the relationship between referral mode (physician vs self) with the Contact’s demographic characteristics (age, gender, race, mechanism of injury, geographic location) and clinical trial status. Results There were a total of 72 face transplantation Contacts The average age of the Contacts was 38 years, and the majority of them were male (n D 41, 569%) The predominant race of Contacts was White (n D 33) and the most prevalent mechanism of injury was burns (n D 32) The majority of our Contacts resided within the US (n D 47), with the majority from the Northeastern US (n D 21) Of the 72 Contacts, 35 (486%) were physician referrals and 37 (514%) were self referrals Physician referrals led to the most screened and transplanted Contacts in our center, whereas self-referral often led to immediate exclusion. Conclusions In this study, we show the diversity of patient characteristics and referral patterns in our clinical trial Furthermore, we describe the relationship of characteristics to outcomes in our cohort and identify areas of improvement, such as patient and physician education. Lastly, we are reminded of face transplantation’s potential impact. Figure 1. Overall clinical status of contacts -no (%). CONTACT Harriet Kiwanuka hkiwanuka@partners.org © 2016 Harriet Kiwanuka, Mario A. Aycart, Ericka Bueno, Muayyad Alhefzi, Nicco Krezdorn, and Bohdan Pomahac. Published with license by Taylor & Francis. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. VASCULARIZED COMPOSITE ALLOTRANSPLANTATION 2016, VOL. 3, NOS. 1–2, 30 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23723505.2016.1232968
2544:面部移植的患者招募和转诊模式
2544:面部移植的患者招募和转诊模式Harriet Kiwanuka, Mario A. Aycart, MD, Ericka Bueno, Muayyad Alhefzi, Nicco Krezdorn和Bohdan Pomahac Brigham and Women 's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA。有希望的短期结果提出了一个关于患者群体的重要问题——进行面部移植的中心是否有效地覆盖了目标面部畸形人群?我们中心回顾了我们的面部移植接触者,以评估患者招募和外展表现。方法:我们对在我们的IRB方案批准期间(2008年2月)至2015年10月期间要求进行面部移植筛查的受试者(又称“接触者”)进行回顾性审查。我们调查了转诊模式(医生vs自我)与接触者的人口学特征(年龄、性别、种族、损伤机制、地理位置)和临床试验状态之间的关系。结果共72例面部移植接触者,平均年龄38岁,以男性居多(n D 41,569%),主要接触者种族为白人(n D 33),最常见的损伤机制为烧伤(n D 32),大部分接触者居住在美国境内(n D 47),大部分来自美国东北部(n D 21)。35例(486%)是医生推荐的,37例(514%)是自我推荐的。医生推荐是我们中心筛选和移植最多的接触者,而自我推荐经常导致立即排除。在本研究中,我们展示了临床试验中患者特征和转诊模式的多样性。此外,我们描述了我们队列中特征与结果的关系,并确定了需要改进的领域,如患者和医生教育。最后,我们被提醒面部移植的潜在影响。图1所示。接触者总体临床状况-无(%)。联系Harriet Kiwanuka hkiwanuka@partners.org©2016 Harriet Kiwanuka, Mario A. Aycart, Ericka Bueno, Muayyad Alhefzi, Nicco Krezdorn和Bohdan Pomahac。由Taylor & Francis授权出版。这是一篇在知识共享署名-非商业许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/)条款下发布的开放获取文章,该许可允许在任何媒体上不受限制的非商业使用、分发和复制,前提是正确引用原始作品。指定作者的精神权利得到了维护。血管化复合异体移植,2016,VOL. 3, no . 1-2, 30 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23723505.2016.1232968
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信