Access to fiction: A problem in classification theory and practice. Part I

C. Beghtol
{"title":"Access to fiction: A problem in classification theory and practice. Part I","authors":"C. Beghtol","doi":"10.5771/0943-7444-1989-3-134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bibliographic classification theory and practice have not been as fully developed for the humanities as for the sciences. In particular, classification systems have not been generally adopted for content elements of primary works of fiction. Analysis of the kinds of exceptions that have been made for these works shows that they are often grouped by a principle that may be called «classification-by-creator» instead of by the more usual principle of «classification-by-subject». This paper explores some implications of the «classification-by-creator» principle and the potential usefulness of more detailed content access to fictional works. Some previous classification systems for fiction are described and a list of fiction analysis systems is included. It is concluded that further investigation of methods of providing users with access to fiction is warranted","PeriodicalId":447796,"journal":{"name":"International classification","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International classification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-1989-3-134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Bibliographic classification theory and practice have not been as fully developed for the humanities as for the sciences. In particular, classification systems have not been generally adopted for content elements of primary works of fiction. Analysis of the kinds of exceptions that have been made for these works shows that they are often grouped by a principle that may be called «classification-by-creator» instead of by the more usual principle of «classification-by-subject». This paper explores some implications of the «classification-by-creator» principle and the potential usefulness of more detailed content access to fictional works. Some previous classification systems for fiction are described and a list of fiction analysis systems is included. It is concluded that further investigation of methods of providing users with access to fiction is warranted
小说获取:分类理论与实践中的一个问题。第一部分
书目分类理论与实践在人文学科的发展不如在科学学科的发展那么充分。特别是对小说初级作品的内容要素,分类制度尚未得到普遍采用。对这些作品的例外类型的分析表明,它们通常按照一种可以称为“按创作者分类”的原则进行分组,而不是按照更常见的“按主题分类”原则进行分组。本文探讨了“按创作者分类”原则的一些含义,以及对虚构作品进行更详细的内容访问的潜在用处。一些以前的分类系统的小说描述和小说分析系统的列表包括。结论是,有必要进一步调查为用户提供小说访问的方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信