Theoretical and legal bases of protection of business entities from raiders in Ukraine

N. Horobets, Yehor Pylypenko
{"title":"Theoretical and legal bases of protection of business entities from raiders in Ukraine","authors":"N. Horobets, Yehor Pylypenko","doi":"10.21272/legalhorizons.2020.i25.p51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of theoretical and legal principles of protection of business entities from raids in Ukraine due to the low level of quality of the system of protection of private property rights in the state. It is stated that for small enterprises the lack of financial resources and the risk of illegal seizure or takeover, ie \"raiding\", is a more common problem, but large enterprises are also subject to raids. It was found that raiding is a real threat to the integrity of enterprises, stable economic development and information security of the state, its danger is confirmed by data on the number of raider seizures of property in Ukraine. It is noted that one of the areas of counteraction to raiding is the consolidation at the legislative level of a common understanding of this concept, but the Civil Code of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine \"On Joint Stock Companies\" deals only with certain aspects of raiding. Features of \"white\", \"gray\", \"black\" raiding are revealed. There are two ways to warn and protect businesses from raiding: the use of government tools and self-preventive protection of the enterprise. The state instruments of warning and protection of enterprises from raids include: legislative guarantees of inviolability of property and protection of property rights of enterprises in case of violation, criminal liability for misappropriation of property, the procedure of state registration of property rights, the right to apply for protection of rights and interests to the court and the Office for Combating Raiding at the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. It is emphasized that only 20% of enterprises independently protect themselves from raider encroachment, which explains the large number of raider seizures in Ukraine. Among the methods of such protection, emphasis is placed on creating a reliable system of protection of information about the company, ensuring timely and full payment of dividends to shareholders, preventing the mass purchase of shares and monitoring the current situation. It is concluded that it is expedient to develop and consolidate at the legislative level a common understanding of the concept of \"raiding\", guarantees of warning and protection of business entities from raiding in Ukraine, improving the powers of courts and the Office for Combating Raiding in Ukraine to consider issues of registration of property rights of enterprises.","PeriodicalId":229465,"journal":{"name":"Legal horizons","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21272/legalhorizons.2020.i25.p51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of theoretical and legal principles of protection of business entities from raids in Ukraine due to the low level of quality of the system of protection of private property rights in the state. It is stated that for small enterprises the lack of financial resources and the risk of illegal seizure or takeover, ie "raiding", is a more common problem, but large enterprises are also subject to raids. It was found that raiding is a real threat to the integrity of enterprises, stable economic development and information security of the state, its danger is confirmed by data on the number of raider seizures of property in Ukraine. It is noted that one of the areas of counteraction to raiding is the consolidation at the legislative level of a common understanding of this concept, but the Civil Code of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine "On Joint Stock Companies" deals only with certain aspects of raiding. Features of "white", "gray", "black" raiding are revealed. There are two ways to warn and protect businesses from raiding: the use of government tools and self-preventive protection of the enterprise. The state instruments of warning and protection of enterprises from raids include: legislative guarantees of inviolability of property and protection of property rights of enterprises in case of violation, criminal liability for misappropriation of property, the procedure of state registration of property rights, the right to apply for protection of rights and interests to the court and the Office for Combating Raiding at the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. It is emphasized that only 20% of enterprises independently protect themselves from raider encroachment, which explains the large number of raider seizures in Ukraine. Among the methods of such protection, emphasis is placed on creating a reliable system of protection of information about the company, ensuring timely and full payment of dividends to shareholders, preventing the mass purchase of shares and monitoring the current situation. It is concluded that it is expedient to develop and consolidate at the legislative level a common understanding of the concept of "raiding", guarantees of warning and protection of business entities from raiding in Ukraine, improving the powers of courts and the Office for Combating Raiding in Ukraine to consider issues of registration of property rights of enterprises.
乌克兰保护商业实体免受攻击的理论和法律依据
本文致力于研究由于国家私有产权保护制度质量低下,乌克兰保护商业实体免受突袭的理论和法律原则。据称,对于小企业来说,缺乏资金和被非法扣押或接管的风险,即“突击搜查”,是一个更常见的问题,但大型企业也会受到突击搜查。调查发现,突击搜查是对企业诚信、经济稳定发展和国家信息安全的现实威胁,其危险性得到了乌克兰突击搜查者扣押财产数量数据的证实。应当指出,对付搜查的一个领域是在立法一级巩固对这一概念的共同理解,但是《乌克兰民法典》、《乌克兰股份公司法》只涉及搜查的某些方面。揭示了“白”、“灰”、“黑”突袭的特点。有两种方法可以警告和保护企业免受袭击:使用政府工具和企业的自我预防保护。国家警告和保护企业不受突击搜查的文书包括:财产不受侵犯的立法保障和对企业侵犯财产权利的保护、侵占财产的刑事责任、国家登记财产权利的程序、向法院和乌克兰司法部打击突击搜查办公室申请保护权益的权利。需要强调的是,只有20%的企业能够独立保护自己免受突击者的侵害,这也解释了乌克兰突击者的大量查获。在这种保护的方法中,重点是建立可靠的公司信息保护制度,确保及时足额地向股东支付股息,防止大规模购买股票和监控当前情况。结论是,最好在立法一级发展和巩固对“突袭”概念的共同理解,保证警告和保护商业实体不受乌克兰境内的突袭,改进法院和乌克兰境内打击突袭办事处审议企业产权登记问题的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信