ngos and the International Law Commission Draft Articles on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters: A Relationship of Mutual or Grudging Respect?

E. Evangelidis, Thérèse O'Donnell
{"title":"ngos and the International Law Commission Draft Articles on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters: A Relationship of Mutual or Grudging Respect?","authors":"E. Evangelidis, Thérèse O'Donnell","doi":"10.1163/26662531-01001008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the role of NGOs in the development and drafting of disaster law in general, and the ILC draft Articles on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters in particular, and by extension what this reveals regarding NGO subjectivity in international law. The substantive content of the draft Articles and their commentaries and how they pertain to NGOs from an operational perspective, is a further area of analysis. The article initially frames humanitarian NGO subjectivity and how this constituency has evolved and how that has implications for its realm of action. Secondly, given its underpinning importance to the ILC project, an analysis of NGO disaster law activity (both autonomous and institutional) is analysed via key instruments. NGOs are a complex and diverse community and attempts to address them in some standardised fashion (which was also acceptable to states) was always going to challenge the ILC. These complexities are analysed in the final main substantive section of the article with particular attention being given to draft Article 12 and the issue of external assistance to disaster-affected states.","PeriodicalId":420790,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of International Disaster Law","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of International Disaster Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/26662531-01001008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses the role of NGOs in the development and drafting of disaster law in general, and the ILC draft Articles on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters in particular, and by extension what this reveals regarding NGO subjectivity in international law. The substantive content of the draft Articles and their commentaries and how they pertain to NGOs from an operational perspective, is a further area of analysis. The article initially frames humanitarian NGO subjectivity and how this constituency has evolved and how that has implications for its realm of action. Secondly, given its underpinning importance to the ILC project, an analysis of NGO disaster law activity (both autonomous and institutional) is analysed via key instruments. NGOs are a complex and diverse community and attempts to address them in some standardised fashion (which was also acceptable to states) was always going to challenge the ILC. These complexities are analysed in the final main substantive section of the article with particular attention being given to draft Article 12 and the issue of external assistance to disaster-affected states.
非政府组织和国际法委员会关于发生灾害时保护人员的条款草案:相互尊重还是勉强尊重的关系?
本文从总体上分析了非政府组织在灾害法制定和起草中的作用,特别是国际法委员会《灾害时人员保护条款》草案,并由此揭示了非政府组织在国际法中的主体性。条款草案及其评注的实质性内容,以及它们如何从业务角度与非政府组织相关联,是进一步分析的领域。这篇文章首先阐述了人道主义非政府组织的主体性,以及这一群体是如何演变的,以及这对其行动领域有何影响。其次,鉴于其对ILC项目的基础重要性,通过关键工具分析了非政府组织(自主和机构)的灾害法活动。非政府组织是一个复杂而多样的群体,试图以某种标准化的方式(这也是各国可以接受的)解决它们总是会挑战国际法委员会。在该条最后的主要实质性部分对这些复杂性进行了分析,特别注意第12条草案和向受灾国家提供外部援助的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信