A Study on the Image Evaluation and Morphological Elements of Buildings In the University Campus

C. Kim, Ick-hwan Kim
{"title":"A Study on the Image Evaluation and Morphological Elements of Buildings In the University Campus","authors":"C. Kim, Ick-hwan Kim","doi":"10.7743/KISS.2013.12.2.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the relationship among the evaluation structure of morphological elements, the satisfaction on exterior elements, and the image evaluation for the campus landmarks by campus type. The investigation results are summarized as follows. 1) The university headquarter was nominated as the university landmark, and the main reason for the nomination was the building`s historic and locational value. 2) Of the morphological elements of the campus landmark, `proportion and balance` and `harmony and order` were deemed important, while `diversity` was deemed less important. 3) For the satisfaction on the facility`s exterior elements, the evaluation structure was different for each university. However, the factor of `location of the facility` was deemed the biggest factor for satisfaction for all universities, while the facility`s `color and material` were found to be the most dissatisfying factors. 4) The image evaluation on the facility was different for each university. Although there was a strong skeptical image about `liveliness`, there was a very positive image about `elegance` and `scale`. 5) On the relationship between the satisfaction on exterior elements and the image evaluation, there was a different evaluation structure for each university. `Facility`s color and exterior material` were the main elements which improved the overall image of the facility. Thus, the study results strongly suggest that an important task is to determine the maintenance direction through the emphasis on the relationship between exterior elements and image satisfaction for each university.","PeriodicalId":420111,"journal":{"name":"The journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7743/KISS.2013.12.2.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study evaluates the relationship among the evaluation structure of morphological elements, the satisfaction on exterior elements, and the image evaluation for the campus landmarks by campus type. The investigation results are summarized as follows. 1) The university headquarter was nominated as the university landmark, and the main reason for the nomination was the building`s historic and locational value. 2) Of the morphological elements of the campus landmark, `proportion and balance` and `harmony and order` were deemed important, while `diversity` was deemed less important. 3) For the satisfaction on the facility`s exterior elements, the evaluation structure was different for each university. However, the factor of `location of the facility` was deemed the biggest factor for satisfaction for all universities, while the facility`s `color and material` were found to be the most dissatisfying factors. 4) The image evaluation on the facility was different for each university. Although there was a strong skeptical image about `liveliness`, there was a very positive image about `elegance` and `scale`. 5) On the relationship between the satisfaction on exterior elements and the image evaluation, there was a different evaluation structure for each university. `Facility`s color and exterior material` were the main elements which improved the overall image of the facility. Thus, the study results strongly suggest that an important task is to determine the maintenance direction through the emphasis on the relationship between exterior elements and image satisfaction for each university.
大学校园建筑形象评价与形态要素研究
本研究以校园类型为单位,考察形态要素评价结构、外在要素满意度与校园地标形象评价之间的关系。调查结果总结如下:1)大学总部被提名为大学地标,提名的主要原因是该建筑的历史和地理位置价值。2)在校园地标的形态要素中,“比例与平衡”和“和谐与秩序”被认为是重要的,“多样性”被认为是次要的。3)对于设施外部要素的满意度,各高校的评价结构存在差异。然而,“设施的位置”被认为是所有大学满意度的最大因素,而设施的“颜色和材料”被认为是最不令人满意的因素。4)各大学对设施的形象评价不同。尽管人们对“活泼”有强烈的怀疑,但对“优雅”和“规模”却有非常积极的印象。5)在外部要素满意度与形象评价的关系上,各高校存在不同的评价结构。“设施的颜色和外部材料”是改善设施整体形象的主要元素。因此,研究结果强烈表明,通过强调每个大学的外部元素与形象满意度之间的关系来确定维护方向是一项重要的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信