Peer assessment in PBL: Does gender matter?

A. Alves, F. Moreira, C. Leão
{"title":"Peer assessment in PBL: Does gender matter?","authors":"A. Alves, F. Moreira, C. Leão","doi":"10.1109/ICE.2017.8280039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work attempts to identify gender differences on the peer assessment process within Project-Based Learning (PBL). It involved the study of perceptions on teamwork and grade results from a total of 330 students distributed by seven successive PBL editions of the Industrial Engineering and Management program. This program can be considered gender balanced, with 51% females and 49% males. The data analyzed focused on peer assessment results and on the final marks. The analysis revealed a positive correlation between the peer assessment grades and the final grades. A gender difference was found on peer grades as well as on final grades, favoring female. The individual merit was put forward in an attempt to justify the differences found, but conclusive evidence should be supported with further investigation.","PeriodicalId":421648,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8280039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This work attempts to identify gender differences on the peer assessment process within Project-Based Learning (PBL). It involved the study of perceptions on teamwork and grade results from a total of 330 students distributed by seven successive PBL editions of the Industrial Engineering and Management program. This program can be considered gender balanced, with 51% females and 49% males. The data analyzed focused on peer assessment results and on the final marks. The analysis revealed a positive correlation between the peer assessment grades and the final grades. A gender difference was found on peer grades as well as on final grades, favoring female. The individual merit was put forward in an attempt to justify the differences found, but conclusive evidence should be supported with further investigation.
PBL中的同伴评估:性别重要吗?
本研究试图确定基于项目的学习(PBL)中同伴评估过程中的性别差异。该研究涉及对330名学生对团队合作的看法和成绩的研究,这些学生由工业工程与管理项目的七个连续PBL版本分发。这个项目可以被认为是性别平衡的,女性占51%,男性占49%。分析的数据集中在同行评估结果和最终分数上。分析表明,同侪评估成绩与最终成绩呈正相关关系。在同辈成绩和最终成绩上,性别差异都有利于女性。个别优点的提出是为了证明所发现的差异是合理的,但是结论性的证据应该得到进一步调查的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信